33
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
33 points (78.9% liked)
Movies and TV Shows
1 readers
2 users here now
General discussion about movies and TV shows.
Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.
Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain
[spoilers]in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.
Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:
::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::
Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!
Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)
Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I feel like I'd be compelled to go fairly dark with it. When The Jetsons was made, it was largely a period of optimism and prosperity in the US. That is most certainly no longer the case, with the middle class pretty much having evaporated, and so many people struggling to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table.
I think I'd probably focus on the company store construct, that has become the foundation of capitalist society. Where everything you earn is due to the good will of those you're obligated to give it back to. In a world with all sorts of wonderful technology, for most, it exists solely to make your toils for the sake of others more efficient.
I don't see how the optimism of The Jetsons can exist today, at least not without mocking the hell out of it.
Then you are not making the Jetsons, just relying on name recognition. This is not an attack on you or the idea but the post WW2 optimism is central to the show.
You would be making another Velma: Taking a light-hearted comedy from decades ago and tossing out everything but the character names.
You're right. I don't think it can be successfully made, today. The best you can do is just barely peak through the facade.
This is an incredibly pessimistic outlook and one I’m glad that, for instance, the makers of Star Trek The Next Generation didn’t share.
When TNG was coming out, the world was reeling from the stagflation of the 1970s and the economic shocks of Reaganomics and Thatcherism.
And still TNG is a very optimistic show, that still managed to touch on the issues of its day in a realistic and non-naive manner.
The brilliance of TNG's utopia is that it is built on the premise that we had to go through a literal hell and near rural self-destruction to get to it. I don't recall if TOS established WW3 first or not, but TNG really leans heavily into the notion that we came within inches of destroying everything.
But the moment we learned we weren't alone in the universe, we turned it around and started building the future we could have had all along.
TOS introduced the Eugenics Wars, a global conflict which took place in the far-flung future of the 1990s. It was never really clear in that series whether or not it was synonymous with WW3, but they did talk about tens of millions dead.
I think the difference is, Star Trek has always been very detached from our own lives. It's not placing the average day in modern times into a futuristic setting, like The Jetsons is.
This was my first thought...
Maybe just have the Jetsons encounter things from 2023, keeping their retro-futuristic technology. It would underscore the dystopian hell we all live in. Like, they're constantly served spam and advertisements, Rosie's subscription-based, their flying car is remotely disabled for a missed payment, everyone is low-level depressed because they never see grass or natural environments...