858
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by uphillbothways@kbin.social to c/politics@lemmy.world

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution bans anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the U.S. from holding office.

A Florida lawyer is suing Donald Trump in an attempt to disqualify his current run for president. Lawrence A. Caplan’s Thursday lawsuit claims that the ex-president’s involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot would make him ineligible to run again, thanks to the Constitution’s 14th Amendment—a Civil War-era addition aimed at preventing those who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the U.S. from holding office. “Now given that the facts seem to be crystal clear that Trump was involved to some extent in the insurrection that took place on January 6th, the sole remaining question is whether American jurists who swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution upon their entry to the bench, will choose to follow the letter of the Constitution in this case,” the lawsuit says, also citing Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. Legal experts say it’s an uphill battle to argue in court, since the amendment has hardly been exercised in modern history. “Realistically, it’s not a Hail Mary, but it’s just tossing the ball up and hoping it lands in the right place,” Charles Zelden, a professor of history and legal studies at Nova Southeastern University, told the South Florida Sun Sentinel.

archive link to South Florida Sun Sentinel article: https://archive.ph/1BntD

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Uncaged_Jay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I don't get it, why try to keep him from running? Especially if you're a Democrat, letting Trump run would split the Republican vote and almost guarantee a Democratic victory.

[-] Todd_cross@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

A lot of people that a similar thing in 2016.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Keeping him from running accomplishes about the same thing. The cultists will refuse to accept any other Republican nominee, and will refuse to vote, calling it "rigged."

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Because I don't think of politics as winning. My politics wins when the state feels comfortable applying rules to the elite.

[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Traitors to your country shouldn't get the opportunity to run

[-] crwcomposer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Dude is a lawyer from Florida, so he's likely conservative and doesn't want Trump to lose the election for the Republicans.

[-] Hangglide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How would it split the vote? It's a two party system.

[-] Uncaged_Jay@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

There are still 3rd parties in the US, a prime example in US politics that would equate to this would be the Election of 1912, where President Wilson won against the incumbent Republican, President Taft. The only reason Wilson won was because Roosevelt ran as a Republican adjacent candidate under the "Bull Moose" party, which effectively split the Republican vote and prevented Taft from getting all of the Republican vote.

If Trump runs again, it is likely he will be running as an independent candidate, which will split the Republican vote and allow the Democrats a sure win.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Why would he run as an independent when he's the front runner for the GOP

[-] Uncaged_Jay@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The powers that be (the old republicans) do not like him, they wouldn't allow him to be the GOP candidate even if he succeeded.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They failed to stop him in 2016 and 2020, so I see no reason to think they'll succeed in stopping him this time.

Out of curiosity, where are you getting this idea? Are there any reputable experts you can point to? I sure haven't seen anyone arguing anything like this apart from you.

Not trying to be a dick, just asking.

[-] Uncaged_Jay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This might be a good place to start.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
858 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19239 readers
1923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS