422
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The homeowner who fatally shot a 20-year-old University of South Carolina student who tried to enter the wrong home on the street he lived on Saturday morning will not face charges because the incident was deemed "a justifiable homicide" under state law, Columbia police announced Wednesday.

Police said the identity of the homeowner who fired the gunshot that killed Nicholas Donofrio shortly before 2 a.m. Saturday will not be released because the police department and the Fifth Circuit Solicitor’s Office determined his actions were justified under the state's controversial "castle doctrine" law, which holds that people can act in self-defense towards "intruders and attackers without fear of prosecution or civil action for acting in defense of themselves and others."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago

While the woman was on the phone with police, Donofrio broke a glass window on the front door "and reached inside to manipulate the doorknob," at which point the male resident fired the shot through the broken window, striking Donofrio in his upper body, police said.

The headline made me instantly rage (as intended). Reading the article made me reconsider. The real answer is to not have guns in the hands of the public. But then only criminals will have guns. Stfu.

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Did you just tell yourself to STFU?

[-] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

If the public wasn't allowed to have guns and this guy did turn out to be a home invader, what would you say then?

[-] currycourier@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I remember reading that statistically it isuch more likely that you kill a friend or family member with a gun than a home invader while trying to defend you're home. Instead of worrying about hypothetical 'what ifs' that are very unlikely to happen maybe we should stay anchored in reality.

[-] beernutz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd introduce them to my baseball bat. Repeatedly. Then call the police.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think I heard on the radio that the homeowner was an old man, so I doubt he'd be capable of using a baseball bat against a college athlete. But I can't find an article that says anything about his age.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd take being shot over being repeatedly bludgeoned with a baseball bat, personally.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

So, you don't want to kill them with a gun, you'd rather get up close and personal and bludgeon their face until they're unrecognizable? Baseball bats are a deadly threat too, go attack someone with one and watch how fast you get an AWDW charge.

[-] Zednix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Look at that 100%justified use. If only it legal to defend yourself where I live like this. That would be great.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
422 points (95.3% liked)

News

23669 readers
3261 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS