269
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
269 points (96.9% liked)
politics
19062 readers
3783 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
DeSantis doesn’t want photos of him next to Biden during the campaign, I bet. Whatever. Both of them simply need to understand the damage, try to instill some faith in the affected people, and make sure the necessary resources continue to get deployed.
Yup, he doesn't want to be Christie hugging Obama during Hurricane Sandy. It's a death-knell for conservative candidates to be seen not spitting in the face of the "opposition" at all times.
Thank Newt Gingich
Nah, I'll thank every republican voter
Why not both?
Frankly they both just need to listen to FEMA and other agencies to know how bad it is, what is needed for funding, etc.
The whole "visit the scene" thing is theater.
A Leader needs to be seen to care for the People being led to have the faith to rebuild. Soulless bureaucrats in far away place to do not instill such faith.
I don't buy that. It's mostly to stop the opposition from saying "look the president doesn't care about you".
There is much History (see any Historic account of a Leader rallying his People, as per Joan D'arc, or for a more recent example see Present day Ukraine) to back up my view and yours assumes bad faith which must first be proven.
Whenever a president fails to visit a disaster site in a timely manner the opposition goes nuts over it. Yet nobody expects the president to lead us into battle. They can but don't - because the opposition doesn't want to either. So they both stay silent about it.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/08/16/editorial-biden-too-slow-on-the-draw-over-maui-disaster/
"He didn't get there fast enough" is a common criticism. And almost all of the criticism comes from the opposition. It's political now.
Myopia which ignores the examples given is hardly a refute.
It's that a confession?
I seriously doubt you are qualified to hear one.
I'll take that as a compliment.
Yes, the are sadly some that take great pleasure in bad faith arguments. Well done.
Other agencies likely, but FEMA doesn't have a spotless record
No agency, person, organization, etc anywhere ever has a "spotless record".
I used to know a FEMA worker and he claimed that the tinfoil hat crowd reaches out to them about once a week on average.
Over-the-shoulder photo looking out of a helicopter.
"Hmm, yes, okay, I see now what you meant by disaster. Thank you for showing me."
Oh Biden isn't listening to FEMA? Can you link me to an example of that?
Tha fuck you talking about?
They're asking you why you felt the need to "both sides" this as if Biden and desantis aren't listening to experts/playing politics, while Biden is doing everything correctly. It's disingenuous to act like the one person who is doing the right thing also needs to work on doing better, while the other is actively making it worse and trying to blame everyone but himself.
I didn't say anything like what you think I said. Take a breath, stop being a partisan hack, and read it again.
IDK man it wasn't clear and I asked you a question. The way you reacted tho is fucking telling tho lol
Telling of what? You've misunderstood everything else. I'd be surprised if you got anything right
I didn't "both sides" anything. Only a partisan hack would see it that way.
Which if he had even the smallest of tiny brain cells, he would see that the ability to work with others you don't necessarily agree with should be seen as a strength. Only playground children behave like him.
The trouble is many of DeSantis' supporters haven't evolved much beyond the playground.
That isn't the way that culture behaves. You cooperate only when you are weak not to go further together. They are operating on a zero sum game with no statue of limitations on memory.
Look I have had my share of difficult clients but it is always in my best interest to make sure they are successful. If they are I can be. We cooperate because together we can do what neither of us can do alone. And since the relationship is not one of where I gain they lose we can do that.
However there can only be one president at a time. Biden looking good makes the MeatBall look bad. Even a temporary alliance can haunt the Meatball because everyone knows he only worked together because he had no choice. Cooperation reeks of weakness and since no allowance is given or sought he has to double down.
DeSantis’ whole platform is based on giving the finger to democrats (and humanity as a whole).
what do you mean "both" "need to", Biden IS, DeSantis IS NOT, fuck fuck fuck fuck
Fuck that, Biden should pull funding the way Trump does for states that don't vote for him, fuck this shit
Congrats on having the same ethics as Donald Trump I guess?
Putting aside how petty this idea is; there are also people in Florida who didn't vote for Trump and you'd be fucking them over too.
I would rather he didn't. Disaster relief shouldn't be tied to personal loyalty to a politician.
Don’t be silly. A president is accountable and responsible for all Americans. One dope’s bullshit shouldn’t be balanced by the same bullshit from the next guy.