[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Russia made that agreement in 1994, broke it in 2014

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

They got this picture of him just seconds after he read that portion of the legal reply.

Absolutely dedicated photographer, capturing the exact facial expression he made exactly in the moment when he read the comment about anger management classes.

That’s dedication there

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Is it big, as in the same size as a regular comic book? That’s what I really want for comics, and I’m also waiting for the colors to get vibrant.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I’ve not seen that happening.

I’ve only ever seen women and sometimes other men dissing men who stand to pee.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

We have taxes on land if that’s what you’re referring to

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

And yet I never see people on the corncob balconies

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

This is stupid, guys. We need to make a new tower.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

They needed special kind of problem solving computation, that only human brains can do. Like generating text or something.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

More like they changed it because the C-suite didn’t understand

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Why did you have his toddler in the back seat??

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Depends on whether it’s a tall tower or a tiny tower.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 40 points 3 days ago

As a conservative I support this idea, because it has no means testing.

Means testing is fucked up in two ways:

  • It makes government larger and gets the government asking questions, poking its nose into everything
  • It creates a perverse incentive structure, one which doesn’t match nature and hence doesn’t match the way our brains evolved to respond to challenge.

The perverse incentive structure is the worse of the two, in my opinion. Just like crack cocaine hacks the brain, presents something the brain can’t handle because it didn’t evolve for, rewarding a person with resources only when they don’t succeed basically programs a person to fail.

I’m all for the government generously giving with an open hand to people, and letting the people decide when to start receiving benefits and when to stop. People are either worth it or they aren’t, and a person doesn’t stop being worth it just because they got their shit together, or start being worth it just because they failed.

Government should treat everyone the same. If a government wants to present a service like “free housing if you want it”, I’m totally fine with that.

2

O’Neill cylinder is that big rotating cylinder space station format that uses the spin for artificial gravity.

At higher elevations the gravity will be lower. BMX bikes will be fun too. Make a big jump and you can go across the center and land on the other side, or go into a zero-gee part in the middle, which works out if you’re always inside a curve.

-8

I’ve noticed ChatGPT gets less able to do precise reasoning or respond to instructions, the longer the conversation gets.

It felt exactly like working with a student who was getting tired and needed to rest.

Then I had above shower thought. Pretty cool right?

Every few months a new ChatGPT v4 is deployed. It’s got new training data, up through X date. They train up a new model on the new content in the world, including ChatGPT conversations from users who’ve opted into that (or didn’t opt out, can’t remember how it’s presented).

It’s like GPT is “sleeping”, to consolidate “the day’s” knowledge into long term memory. All the data in the current conversation is its short term memory. After handling a certain amount of complexity in one conversation, the coherence of responses breaks down, becomes more habitual and less responsive to nuance. It gets tired and can’t go much further.

view more: next ›

intensely_human

joined 1 year ago