[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

waaaaannnnnnnntttttt!!! that would be amazing

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Seems like quite confusing English (I still don't get it).

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Feel the same about the decision as what?

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

My guess is the assholeness is also built up resentment, because clear communication is socially taboo. We use euphemisms and hints, we say things without saying it, we avoid being rude and hide feelings. I've always hated that.

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Feel the same as what?

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago

Even as a kid, that "ideal" seemed miserable to me. I guess I kinda see it if we adjust it to me being transbian, but it's still not ideal. I think I'd be a lot happier in a much more communal culture, which is the opposite of the American Dream.

I'm also not monogamist, so uh, yeah, that's very not compatible with this system.

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

More than that: if you seem incompatible, why are you hiding it behind resentful jokes instead of actually confronting it?

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 73 points 5 days ago

I don't understand how people end up married to someone they only kinda like and tolerate. Idk if I'll ever marry because I want to be very sure we love each other and are compatible before making big decisions like that.

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

I wouldn't have a problem with someone using males/females in a vacuum, but all too often I read men/females from incels and misogynists on the Internet, so now "females" feels derogatory by default.

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 4 weeks ago

I know by your comment history you probably didn't mean it this way, but when most people hear someone referring to "females" they think they're bring deliberately dehumanized like the kind of person who follows Andrew Tate would do.

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 8 months ago

Suck her dick as well!

[-] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 9 months ago

It makes more sense if you think of const as "read-only". Volatile just means the compiler can't make the assumption that the compiler is the only thing that can modify the variable. A const volatile variable can return different results when read different times.

view more: next ›

zea_64

joined 1 year ago