[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 178 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is disgusting, how can so many Americans look at this man's antics and think a single positive thing? A criminal, rapist, liar, narcissistic, selfish, easily manipulated, hate monger, moron but the exit polls say "oh Trump would be best for the economy" like are you fucking kidding me? The guy with the plan to slap a tariff on every other thing? The guy who can't string together a coherent speech for the economics club? What a joke this all is, and here I am absoltuly physically sick about it. I'm sick because it actually matters, it does, it matters and it's so damn close this fucking clown could be in power again, after killing so many people, after taking women's rights away, after all of it, and because what? Voters remember cheaper bananas or some shit? Fuck this life.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 281 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Big tough guy sucker punched an old lady. Trump would be proud if it were possible for him to give a shit about anyone but himself.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 136 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Two days from now timelines are going split. I don't know what will happen in both, but I can tell you for sure I'd like to avoid the timeline where Trump wins. If for no other reason than all the bad breath this single choice will cause.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 138 points 2 months ago

Hey, good for him. I believe firmly in reformation, or reflection and changing your views and it sounds to me like he thought about it and came around, so good.

304
submitted 4 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump’s campaign was warned about not taking photographs before an altercation at Arlington National Cemetery during a wreath-laying ceremony earlier this week to honour service members killed in the Afghanistan War withdrawal, a defense official told The Associated Press on Wednesday.

[...]

“Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate’s campaign,” the cemetery officials’ statement said. “Arlington National Cemetery reinforced and widely shared this law and its prohibitions with all participants. We can confirm there was an incident, and a report was filed.”

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 144 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

My god the media is rubbish, "Trump came under fire in 2015 after he appeared to mock a New York Times reporter with a disability". Like, are you kidding me? Are you fucking kidding me? Appeared my ass, he did mock a man with a disability, it isn't a debate, or a perception, or the appearance, he did that shit.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 205 points 5 months ago

This:

“When you feed a baby, Bobby, a vaccination, there’s like 38 different vaccines. And it looks like it’s meant for a horse, not a, you know, 10 pound or 20 pound baby,” Trump said to Kennedy, echoing a claim he’s made in the past. “And then you see the baby all of a sudden starting to change radically—I’ve seen it too many times. And then you hear that it doesn’t have an impact.”

Really puts this:

Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.

Into the right perspective.

73
submitted 7 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
56
submitted 8 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

"All of my proposals are constitutional," Poilievre said.

"We will make them constitutional using whatever tools the constitution allows me to use to make them constitutional. I think you know exactly what I mean."

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 140 points 8 months ago

Most men idiots, this man say.

34
submitted 8 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 222 points 8 months ago

I want to make a movie so painfully obvious in its satire that everyone who understands it lives in perpetual psychological torment inflicted on them by all the people who don't.

Brutal. He did it too, he did it.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 262 points 9 months ago

Anyone telling you both sides same are either a bad actor or so incredibly privelleged that they can just not care about this kind of thing.

39
submitted 9 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

"They have to get people back to work," Premier Doug Ford said during a press conference on Thursday in Ottawa, standing next to Mayor Mark Sutcliffe.

"It sounds crazy. I'm begging people to go to work for three days — not that they aren't working at home, but it really affects the downtown."

38
submitted 10 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Albertans will pay more if they smoke, vape, or drive an EV.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 183 points 10 months ago

So, just to be certain, when USA today keeps giving Trump the benefit of the doubt and uses words in this article like, riot, and alleged role, they're carrying water for him right? The man has been found to have had a role andtaken part in an insurrection in multiple cases now. They should just say it.

56
submitted 10 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault says the federal government will stop investing in new road infrastructure — a comment that immediately drew the ire of the Opposition Conservatives and some premiers who said the climate activist turned politician is out of touch.

Guilbeault said Tuesday the government will be there to support provinces paying for maintenance but Ottawa has decided that the existing road infrastructure "is perfectly adequate to respond to the needs we have."

"There will be no more envelopes from the federal government to enlarge the road network," Guilbeault said, according to quotes published in the Montreal Gazette.

"We can very well achieve our goals of economic, social and human development without more enlargement of the road network."

Guilbeault said the federal government is intent on moving people out of their cars and into public transportation, which the government has spent billions to build.

The federal government also wants to encourage "active transportation," which means getting people to walk and cycle.

41
submitted 11 months ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
37
submitted 1 year ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

The federal government intends to resurrect a post-war effort to ramp up housing construction across Canada — but with a 21st-century twist.

A consultation process will begin next month on developing a catalogue of pre-approved home designs to accelerate the home-building process for developers, Housing Minister Sean Fraser said Tuesday.

It's a reboot of a federal policy from the post-Second World War era, when the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. developed straightforward blueprints to help speed up the construction of badly needed homes, Fraser said.

"When many thousands of soldiers were returning home to be reunited with their families at once, Canada faced enormous housing crunches," he said.

"We intend to take these lessons from our history books and bring them into the 21st century." .... [More in the article]

13
submitted 1 year ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
107
submitted 1 year ago by FunderPants@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 185 points 1 year ago

The decline of legal streaming, through the dividing up of content onto multiple expensive streaming platforms, has pushed me away from legal options onto the black/grey market where I can get much more content for much less on a more convenient single platform.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 229 points 1 year ago

Trump went from majority support to majority support. He will win the nomination because conservatives, Republicans in particular are terrible, awful people. None of this is really even new, they've been terrible for decades and decades.

1

A snippet " The Topic Concentration chart above lends the clearest picture into the implied rationale behind the bans. Namely, the bans are not and have not been about the physical removal of a book from a shelf. The bans instead are meant to:

Virtue signal by people in positions of institutional power to voting-age parents interested in school choice, parental rights, and wedge social issues to the detriment of non-voting age students

Reject and exclude topics that challenge a perceived status quo from the public discourse (e.g. non-heteronormativity, non-cis identity, non-traditional gender roles, and non-Judeo-Christian books are targeted) "
view more: next ›

FunderPants

joined 2 years ago