44
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

An idea I just recently had was to add the ability for users to verify accounts on Lemmy using Matrix accounts as an alternative to Email. I think this would be a great idea since it allows for users to have choices in how they sign-up to their accounts. It would also encourage more usage of Matrix accounts for secure messaging between users, a feature which hasn't seen much use among users here.

It would still in most cases be optional and server admins could choose if it's even enabled at all, just like how email verification is right now. Even if it was required I feel like it should be a supplement to email in most cases but servers could choose to make it required instead of email, especially in cases where they don't have a mail server.

The different states of it could be:

  • Matrix or Email Required
  • Matrix required, Email optional
  • Email Required, Matrix optional
  • Email and/or Matrix Optional

Servers could also choose to have the matrix account used for verification be on a server that isn't their own, though this would generally be discouraged and would be specifically for admins who don't have their own infrastructure (like the ones who don't have a mail server).

I made an issue on the Main Lemmy github, feel free to check it out here. Feel free to either share your opinions on this here or on the Github issue.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

I haven't made any arguments in this thread, you are putting words in my mouth, and not really helping your credibility. All I said is that the person should defederate Lemmy instances and communities which go against the mission of their instance. Something that almost all instance operators would likely agree on.

Just for the record though, I don't believe people should be kicked out of a project based on their nationality, that seems incredibly xenophobic. I don't know where you got that idea that I said any of those things from.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Still worth while to do so, the trick is you need to defederate problematic instances. Not hide them, fully defederate. That stops problematic instances and communties from affecting your userbase. There's many great Lemmy servers and communties out there. Just because a few of them aren't great doesn't mean you should dismiss all of them.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The guy who runs the growyourownservices network despite seeming very professional is extremely emotionally biased and hates Lemmy as a software (and seemingly any instances that will choose to run that software, regardless of their affiliation towards the developers).

So he basically refuses to acknowledge the existence of Lemmy and by extension a large portion of the threaded fediverse, and when he does acknowledge it he's talking shit about it.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

It's not nearly the same as following communities or groups, it's just a collection of posts grouped by tags, as opposed to a space where people discuss or post about a more broad topic. Also Communities and groups typically invite more interaction than simply tagging posts by virtue of being a place people post as opposed to simply being a post tag category.

I should note that there are groups on Mastodon (Not really in Mastodon itself but federated Group actors from other services show up there) though they are less intuitive and thus are usually overlooked by most Mastodon users.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Ubuntu, because snaps break shit and don't work right a lot of the time, also they left people hanging with 32 bit support which isn't great (for being a Legacy OS for weak computers it's not a great look for them, or all the Linux distros that followed them).

There were a lot of problems with Fedora and CentOS, none of them as bad as Ubuntu though. Most were either instability or software availability due to lacking RPM versions of the software I needed.

Arch itself hasn't given me many problems but it is ideologically problematic for a lot of reasons (mainly the elitism) and it is also a rolling release which isn't great if you don't like being a guinea pig and getting software before all the bugs have been ironed out.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

It's not actually unstable, more accurately it's tested and verified as much as Debian stable, meaning it's fine for desktop use but I wouldn't use it for a server or critical system I plan on running 24/7 without interruption, both since it may have bugs that develop after long term use and gets more frequent updates which will be missed and render it out of date quickly if it's running constantly.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

Most of the Laptops I see with Linux are Ubuntu, some Ubuntu based distro like Tuxedo, Pop_OS, or Linux mint, and very Rarely Fedora (I'm not sure, but I think I saw one ship with Fedora).

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Canonical's changes to apt could be considered malicious in and of themselves because it installs from a source you didn't request for, sure seems malicious to me.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This kind of newspeak censorship is absolutely evil. We should absolutely go against any people or entities pushing it forward.

I'm not going to say exactly what I'd want to do to them because it would likely violate the Geneva convention, though honestly I feel like it shouldn't if we should also be allowed to punch, shoot, or otherwise violently attack Nazis, why not these evil people trying to suppress us and Push newspeak right now? Ultimately they're being civil right now but once they have their way they'll be beating and arresting us (Just like the polite Nazis would).

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Like you don't find tons of weird people in Cities.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Soviet equipment is much more repairable than any of the modern crap we have nowadays which is designed to be used and tossed in a relatively short timeframe.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

That's what she said.

view more: next ›

Draconic_NEO

joined 1 year ago