Well at least designer was still there. The same one who mandated the use of procedural generation to make Oblivion's dungeons and Skyrim's radiant quests.
Same metrics anyone judges art by, what it says to them. This is incredibly context dependent.
Show me the art and if just showing it to someone is insufficient, explain it to me.
Art is a form of communication, to hear that someone can be moved by expressionless AI slop is kinda like hearing someone had an enlightening conversation with a dog.
Like sure I can imagine someone can interpret a dog's barks to mean something, but it's still a bizarre scenario that says more about the person than it does the art.
Give us some examples of moving AI generated images.
It’s always a personal matter what you see in art, any interpretation that makes sense to you is valid
No, the thing that the author was trying to express has far greater validity than whatever the reader makes up. If that wasn't the case, AI art, where the author lacks any intent, wouldn't seem so lifeless.
AI art proved beyond a doubt that death of the author was always 99% bullshit justifying media illiteracy. Now that we have art without an author and it is totally void of expression.
You can smuggle a rotisserie chicken under your kilt.
A German accusing queer folk of promoting degeneracy, where have I seen this before?
Then I am confused why you would disagree with the left, that the political philosophy of capitalism, liberalism, is to blame.
A polar bear's skin must be pretty thick to not give a shit about a baby hanging on by the claws.
We don’t have a lot of dyed in the wool capitalists on Lemmy
*dyed in the wool liberals
Liberalism is the philosophy of capitalism, capitalists are people who owns significant amounts of capital.
Yeah sure, I bet China's economy is going to stop improving conditions for its people and stop building infrastructure and collapse any day now.