[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 32 points 11 months ago

EGS losing money has been great for gamers, as they continue to give away free games in an attempt to claw any marketshare. Gamers continue to win as long as this situation lasts. But reading these comments, nobody seems to recognize this.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, instead they will discontinue their websites and make you use their app.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 year ago

Dude can charge whatever he wants, and you can choose to buy it or not. Super weird and annoying responses here.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 year ago

I love Brave, use it daily, and this article didn't convince me at all. Vaguely motioning at the founder's ancient political donations or the optional crypto features, doesn't make a strong case.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I feel like it's one small community instead of an interconnected larger one, unfortunately.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Your point is the worse product should win? Open source can totally compete on features: we have way more developers than them. With Linux I can have basically any feature I want if I tinker enough. It's about: what's the best software for people?

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I developed an early VR game called Soundboxing. It was a VR beat game before Beat Saber. It was doing hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales on Steam, but Facebook repeatedly denied us access to their store with no explanation, bought Beat Saber, basically took over the industry and shut us out. They even sent us early Quest devkits that we spent 6 months porting to, only to be denied again. I'm super salty about it all tbh. But yeah, this is not that, this I see as an absolute win.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

In your scenario, Lemmy was worse than Kbin and didn't suit users needs as well, and didn't evolve the protocol fast enough to keep up. Kbin deserved to win in that case.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Extension implies that the protocol is missing some capability, otherwise it wouldn't need to be extended. So we need to make the protocol better so they have nothing to add. If we don't add those capabilities, ever, then the protocol is doomed to eventual irrelevance and wasn't worth fighting over anyway.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Again, another thread where two billion people joining our network and meeting us where we are ... is somehow bad. If embrace extend extinguish is really the worry, then we have a bad protocol that needs extension to be usable by those 2B people, and we should fix that.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Am I living in a different planet from the rest of the commenters here? We have much more to gain from this than they do.

[-] ericflo@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

No, it'll never go away, fortunately or unfortunately depending on your perspective.

view more: next โ€บ

ericflo

joined 1 year ago