A pedantic thing to say, surely, but the title really should've been: "Linux Directory Structure" -- 'Linux filesystems' (the title in the graphic) refers to a different topic entirely; the title of this post mitigates the confusion a bit, though still, 'directory structure' is the better term.
what message? This was a real product released by Sony.
But they're already back! The Steam Deck is the resurrected Steam Machine.
The bot says it 'saved 0%'; so at least it's honest.
I was intrigued for a moment; installed the package; then got greeted with this -- I don't think I'll proceed any further:
This can't go on, I must inform the Hurd,
Can this monolith be real, or just some crazy dream?
But I feel drawn towards the GPL-2,
Seem to mesmerize, can't avoid Tivoization!
Thanks indeed; but I think I'd be more impressed if it were actually true.
(but yeah, the first draft of Star Wars was called 'journal of the whills'.)
Little known fact: A Stanford mainframe kept logs of the activities of the 'wheels' in a journal -- the 'journal of the wheels'. Young George Lucas, who briefly attended the university, found that journal, and became fascinated with the 'Wheel Wars'. He later drafted a document that he called 'Journal of the Whills', based largely on what he read on those logs; this is the draft that later became 'Whill Wars', and ultimately, of course, 'Star Wars'.
OK, but are they taking into account the energy expenditure of the programmer's brain while writing the program? The amount of calories his/her brain has to burn in order to produce & debug the code?
I mean, this is cringe AF.
Kotlin 'built by communism'? Because the founders of JB are Russian? Is that it?
Swift is 'greed' how? It's open source since 2015 or so; & available on Linux. Apple's graphical toolkits are 'closed down'; & obviously restrict users' freedoms; though not sure how that implies 'monopoly'. 'Monopoly' would be trying to dominate all toolkits, not have one's own.
Vague word associations are cool, I guess.
007
is a pretty ideal permission scheme for a spy, though: Deny access to owner & group; let some 3rd party do whatever he likes.
This is the right response to the OP's bizarre "question", of course, but ... yeah ... the 'for the most part' qualifier is key here.