[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago

That solution will still require the fat lazy selfish car drivers to choose to sacrifice a little of their personal comfort for the sake of the common good.

Yes, the alternatives need to exist, but there also has to be cultural change. Driving a private car in a city is antisocial. It's exactly analagous to smoking in a restaurant or office and we need to begin to see it that way.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes, I've had similar experiences recently and similar thoughts. Crossing land borders in Asia is more stressful than it was a few years ago. Lots of redundant security theater and biometrics everywhere. Of course, China is on another level to everyone else. At the immigration booth, your conversation with the official is now translated and subtitled in real time on both sides. And face ID is now so universal in China that I suspect the fingerprinting has become an afterthought. Everyone is being filmed and tracked pretty much everywhere. Not just cash but even ticket numbers are now redundant. Everything is attached to your personal ID and cameras decide whether you enter public buildings, train stations and so on. The day their government decides to really abuse all that power, they're in deep trouble.

In my experience the border thing is clearly worst in Asia, but with the exception of China it's mostly just tiresome theater.

By contrast I crossed into the Schengen zone from Turkey this summer and was surprised by how little security there was. But then I noticed the police all but dismantling a bunch of heavy goods vehicles in their search for illicit migrants. That was absolutely not security theater.

PS. This subject got me thinking. I've seen a ton of borders because I like to travel by land. Different regions of the world definitely have different priorities at borders. In Asia it's drugs and contraband. They care what's in your bag. In Europe and North America, it's you they care about: why you're here and when you're going to leave. In police states like China, borders are a golden opportunity to harvest a ton of data on suspect individuals. In much of the rest of the world, Latin America for example, borders are mainly just an employment scheme, bureaucracy for its own sake.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

It stands to reason. The light at the beginning and end of the day has a lower color temperature, i.e. (confusingly) reddish rather than bluish. Blue midday-temperature light is therefore something that evolution has prepared us to see in the middle of the day rather than late at night.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago

The issue is more general. When dealing with, say, apt, my experience is that nothing ever breaks and any false move is immediately recoverable. When dealing with Python, even seemingly trivial tasks inevitably turn into a broken mess of cryptic error messages and missing dependencies which requires hours of research to resolve. It's a general complaint. The architecture seems fragile in some way. Of course, it's possible it's just because I am dumb and ignorant.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

This is the one Android app I have used without discontinuity since almost the very beginning. So, around 13 years. The team behind it are fairly well organised and responsive, and the app continues to improve steadily. The fact that so few normies have even heard of it is still a source of mystery to me. It's a treasure.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If you're having to type out version numbers in your commands, something is broken.

I ended up having to roll my own shell script wrapper to bring some sanity to Python.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The tone of this ostensible appeal for tolerance strikes me as disturbingly aggressive and inquisitorial.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes yes, I know all that. The fact remains that a permanent IP associated with an individual is personally identifying information. Even the variety in browser requests counts as such according to the GDPR, and that is usually pooled with lots of other users. This is clearly a level above that. It's why, for example, I would not use the VPS for proxy web browsing: zero privacy.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

In an ideal world, creators would accept that only 10% of their viewers would contribute to them monetarily

Agreed.

(through patreon or donations)

and then you lapse into using "patreon" as if it's a generic noun!

Not your intention I know, but this kind of corporate capture of minds has to end somehow.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What’s the downside you see from having a static IP address?

What's the downside to having one's phone number in the public directory? There's no security risk and yet plenty of people opt out. It's personally identifying information.

I don’t know if any companies provide reverse proxies without a CDN though.

Exactly.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

This whole subject is such a chestnut here. No messaging option is perfect, you will need to compromise. If a perfect option existed you would have heard of it already. And if you haven't heard of it, then by definition it must be small with few users and even fewer maintainers to keep an eye on its codebase and security, which is risky in itself.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago

Can recommend Hetzner (German IP). Good value and so far solid.

Before that I used OVH (French IP) for years but it ended badly. First they locked me out of my account for violating 2FA which I had not asked for or been told about, and would not provide any recourse except sending them a literal signed paper letter, which I had to do twice because the first one they ignored. A nightmare which went on for weeks. And then, cherry on the cake, my VPS literally went up in smoke when their Strasbourg data center burned down! Oops! Looks like your VPS is gone, sorry about that, here's a voucher for six months free hosting! Months later they discovered a backup but the damage was done. Never again.

5

Banks, email providers, booking sites, e-commerce, basically anything where money is involved, it's always the same experience. If you use the Android or iOS app, you stayed signed in indefinitely. If you use a web browser, you get signed out and asked to re-authenticate constantly - and often you have to do it painfully using a 2FA factor.

For either of my banks, if I use their crappy Android app all I have to do is input a short PIN to get access. But in Firefox I also get signed out after about 10 minutes without interaction and have to enter full credentials again to get back in - and, naturally, they conceal the user ID field from the login manager to be extra annoying.

For a couple of other services (also involving money) it's 2FA all the way. Literally no means of staying signed in on a desktop browser more than a single session - presumably defined as 30 minutes or whatever. Haven't tried their own crappy mobile apps but I doubt very much it is such a bad experience.

Who else is being driven crazy by this? How is there any technical justification for this discrimination? Browsers store login tokens just like blackbox spyware on Android-iOS, there is nothing to stop you staying signed in indefinitely. The standard justification seems to be that web browsers are less secure than mobile apps - is there any merit at all to this argument?

Or is all this just a blatant scam to push people to install privacy-destroying spyware apps on privacy-destroying spyware OSs, thus helping to further undermine the most privacy-respecting software platform we have: the web.

If so, could a legal challenge be mounted using the latest EU rules? Maybe it's time for Open Web Advocacy to get on the case.

Thoughts appreciated.

view more: next ›

JubilantJaguar

joined 1 year ago