[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

"Journal", "it's", and "because" are all mispelled in the original.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Nah, that's another cut up with very little of the interview

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

If there was a government-mandated monopoly on coffee and it was sold in L/s, we probably would.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Surprised not to see any posts referencing the Arbitrary List of Popular Lights or !flashlight@lemmy.world.

One of the requirements to make it on the list is:

A user interface where a single click turns the light on in a reasonable mode, and another single click turns it off.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I absolutely understand the anger at the Democratic party. I mention several useful activities to work toward fixing its many failings. The Republican party is strictly worse. Giving equal support to both is counterproductive.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

This is an incorrect framing of the situation. You aren't being asked for a Yes/No vote on Democrats. You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans. Or for this election, if you prefer Democracy or Fascism. If you vote "no preference", that does not communicate "I prefer the Democrats, but want them to move further left", either logically or politically.

There are lots of ways to communicate desired policy changes: letter-writing, primaries (including campaigning/funding for candidates), protests, marches, press, social-media, etc. Voting against your interest is not one of them.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

Humans have honored the dead since before homo sapiens. Laws can be complicated, contradictory, and confusing; respecting the dead is clear and primal.

Yeah, this probably won't change a lot of minds, but some folks will see there is something wrong about a man who would dishonor the dead to celebrate himself.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago

For anyone wondering, this doesn't actually work, because the bananas will realize they are upside-down.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 69 points 5 months ago

The complete rules are here: https://www.transportation.gov/airconsumer/refundsfinalruleapril2024

The meat of it is the table on pages 9-14 and mostly comprehensible.

Worth noting:

  • A change to your flight number is always a "cancellation" and you may choose to accept a refund
    • The expectation is most people would not, for the same reason most don't cancel their refundable tickets - they want to go on the flight
  • There are no carve outs for weather, etc.
    • I am really glad to see this because airlines could claim "weather" for connecting flights, so any weather anywhere meant they could delay your flight
[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

Funny running across this article after reading https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

Spoiler: the author does not have a high opinion of Raghavan.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

NHS to discontinue delivery of babies until double-blind study is done vs just leaving it in there.

view more: next ›

RustyEarthfire

joined 1 year ago