Correct. You posted it. Which means you wanted others to read it.

I posted it so that others could read it if they wished. I'm ambivalent about people reading or not reading the articles. And it's not my issue if you don't understand posting something you don't agree with. Feel free to only post things you do agree with. You are free to do that. As I am free to post what I post.

Thank you!

You can bring that up with The Hill, the respected news org that published the article. I didn't write it, thought it was interesting. Posted it. That's it.

I've posted articles that are pro-Trump and I've posted articles that are anti-Trump. Same with Harris. Same with Stein.

It's political news, this is a political news community. Thanks!

I’ve posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.

I don't have to subscribe every statement in every article I post.

So, if you’re assuming I agree with every viewpoint in the articles I post, how does that even work when I share so many conflicting perspectives?!

Thank you! :)

I'm free to choose when and what I wanna respond to. As are you. Thanks, friend! :)

I'm just posting articles, friend. Feel free to avoid reading them if you prefer. Thank you! :)

I'm free to respond to replies and explain myself when I feel like it, and I'm free to decline to respond to replies and decline to explain myself when I feel like it.

I'm under no obligation to do anything for you.

Thanks, friend! :)

Meh, I think Harris will win by a sizeable margin. But I'm also not scared of Trump winning. I'm not voting for either one of them.

Thank you! :)

Who were you quoting? Because I've never said that sentence.

Thank you! :)

Which is why I think she'll win with no problems.