None. Don't connect it to the internet. Get a PC and use the TV as a glorified monitor.
All I hear is
"Government bad! Government bad! Government bad!".
" WE NEED HELP FROM THE GOVERNMENT".
All while all the other assholes that aren't affected going "Government bad! Government bad! Government bad!"
And Vance and all the others making up stories and admitting to making up stories to help...just help someone else.
Truth is, it's all a scam to begin with. So sounds like they're nailing it.
Sounds like a 2000's cell phone ringer.
Timing belt needs a good tightening is all.
Also, WHY should I trust Mozilla with this? I use Firefox because it's the best alternative at the moment. However, Mozilla is degrading that trust by pushing their weather thing, pocket, turning on their ad network, etc.
Like a real reason I should trust Mozilla with this. Any company is 1 executive away from becoming Google levels of anti-privacy. So why would I EVER trust this?
First off, yes, the title of the post is misleading. Mozilla is creating a privacy focused ad system. However, I legit don't get who this is for.
As a user, I'm not turning off my adblockers. Yes, privacy is important. I'm ok with some ads, but I'm not going to risk my privacy and security, because it's not like I'll have a clue who is backing said ads. So it's not for me.
Normal users have shown that they really don't care, let alone have any kind of clue what's going on. So it's not for them.
Advertisers have huge incentive to show you targeted ads. They don't want to show someone an ad on the other side of the planet for something they don't have access to. Also why would they want to show you an ad for something completely unrelated. What's the incentive for them to give up their targeted ads?
It's not like Mozilla is poising themselves for any kind of government oversight. I'm in the US, and the US gov doesn't seem to give a shit. And the EU, while they have GDPR and they're fining companies left and right, it doesn't seem like they're really targeting these kinds of ads. Outside of those two I don't know anything about other countries honestly.
So again, I have zero clue who this is for or why Mozilla thinks this will be successful. There's no incentive or knowledge that this is needed.
I use Firefox. I run Linux. I'm not trying to bash Mozilla here. I'm not trying to be a naysayer. I'm just trying to understand what kind of real world use case this solves and incentivizes users and advertises to use it over the alternatives.
Welp, I had no plans of buying Palworld. I've been playing Enshrouded instead. But I'll be picking it up now. Screw you Nintendo and your anticompetitive ways.
Pays $40 billion to allow people to be shadow toxic. What an amazing innovator in our midsts. We're all just so jealous we wish we could be so genius ...
Fucking moron.
If anyone checked the filing presentation they literally put questions marks for their profitability. It was HILLARIOUS.
If scale is no longer an issue, why can't Epic create a store with similar functionality to steam? Because it's not about that. It's about Tim not being able to pocket as much.
And they were never heard from AGAIN! Oooooooo It is horror month, and that's pretty scary! :-D