[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38797213

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/hubfs/Reports/2023_lf_annual_report_122123a.pdf?hsLang=en

- Cloud, Containers, & Virtualization 25%

- Networking & Edge 13%

- AI, ML, Data & Analytics 12%

- Web & Application Development 11%

- Cross-Technology 8%

- Privacy & Security 4%

- IoT & Embedded 4%

- Blockchain 4%

- DevOps, CI/CD, & Site Reliability 3%

- Open Source & Compliance Best Practices 3%

- System Administration 2%

- Linux Kernel 2%

- System Engineering 2%

- Storage 2%

- Open Hardware 1%

- Safety-Critical Systems 1%

- Visual Effects 1%

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

More surprising is that it's taken ~4 years for these Linux kernel patches to materialize with Zen 3 having first debuted in late 2020.

Reminder: Linux kernel funding is 2% of the Linux foundation's 200M$/year budget.

Anti Commercial-AI license

128

Many might've seen the Australian ban of social media for <16 y.o with no idea of how to implement it. There have been mentions of "double blind age verification", but I can't find any information on it.

Out of curiosity, how would you implement this with privacy in mind if you really had to?

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 135 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I like the prospect of more Linux hardware hitting the market with officially supported distros. The European Union should be funding this kind of stuff to supplant Microsoft within its borders.

Anti Commercial-AI license

109

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/25405532

Qualcomm engineering director Trilok Soni recently confirmed that the company's Linux team published Linux kernel updates for the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor. Qualcomm unveiled the SoC earlier this month, targeting a new generation of flagship phones and tablets supporting Android and Linux.

12
7

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/21810137

Radicle is an open source, peer-to-peer code collaboration stack built on Git. Unlike centralized code hosting platforms, there is no single entity controlling the network. Repositories are replicated across peers in a decentralized manner, and users are in full control of their data and workflow.

95

Linux maintainers are unwilling to get rust into the kernel, so some rust folks decided to start writing a new kernel with same ABI. This allows them to make new architectural decisions. An example being their "frame kernel" (something between a monolithic kernel and a microkernel).

If I may say, it's more legible and the tooling is way better, right off the bat.

168
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

Andreas Kling aka @awesomekling wrote:

We've been evaluating a number of C++ successor languages for @ladybirdbrowser , and the one best suited to our needs appears to be @SwiftLang ๐Ÿชถ

Over the last few months, I've asked a bunch of folks to pick some little part of our project and try rewriting it in the different languages we were evaluating. The feedback was very clear: everyone preferred Swift!

Why do we like Swift?

First off, Swift has both memory & data race safety (as of v6). It's also a modern language with solid ergonomics.

Something that matters to us a lot is OO. Web specs & browser internals tend to be highly object-oriented, and life is easier when you can model specs closely in your code. Swift has first-class OO support, in many ways even nicer than C++.

The Swift team is also investing heavily in C++ interop, which means there's a real path to incremental adoption, not just gigantic rewrites.

Strong ties to Apple?

Swift has historically been strongly tied to Apple and their platforms, but in the last year, there's been a push for "swiftlang" to become more independent. (It's now in a separate GitHub org, no longer in "apple", for example).

Support for non-Apple platforms is also improving, as is the support for other, LSP-based development environments.

What happens next?

We aren't able to start using it just yet, as the current release of Swift ships with a version of Clang that's too old to grok our existing C++ codebase. But when Swift 6 comes out of beta this fall, we will begin using it!

No language is perfect, and there are a lot of things here that we don't know yet. I'm not aware of anyone doing browser engine stuff in Swift before, so we'll probably end up with feedback for the Swift team as well.

I'm super excited about this! We must steer Ladybird towards memory safety, and the first step is selecting a successor language that we can begin adopting very soon. ๐Ÿค“๐Ÿž

6

So, I think the admins are doing a great job and wanted to donate, however it only seems to be possible to donate via Github (snowe's account). Saying Microsoft isn't my favorite company would be putting it lightly, so going through them to donate is... not happening.

Is there any other way to donate? I'd even do bitcoin or monero if so requested (crypto market is having meltdown right now, so it's cheaper than usual ๐Ÿค‘ ).

6

I tried accessing !nytimes@rss.ponder.cat from programming.dev and there's nothing there, but https://rss.ponder.cat/c/nytimes sure has a bunch.

Is there another federation issue in lemmy again?

Anti Commercial-AI license

39

I just finished watching Why Google Stores Billions of Lines of Code in a Single Repository and honestly, while it looks intriguing, it also looks horrible.

Have you run into issues? Did you love it? How was it/

75
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 113 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Multiple things:

  • get rid of mandatory mailinglists
  • use a modern git flow without emails
  • get the hell off of discord
  • don't make me a "maintainer". I write code, I love it. Don't Peter Principle me
  • pay me if I'm supposed to care

The goddamn Linux Foundation is investing more into AI than friggin Linux. They could be hiring hundreds of staff to work on Linux with the billions they shove unto AI. What the fuck are they doing? Mozilla is another offender.

Open source foundations with money should be using it to develop open source.

Also, on greybeard conferences: allow virtual participation please? My company isn't going to give me 4 days off to travel somewhere for one day, have a 2 day conference, then take another day to get back. Nor am I going to pay 200+โ‚ฌ or something as an entrance fee on top of my ticket halfway around the world.

Anti Commercial-AI license

86
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

The only real attempt at monetisation that I've seen is https://beetoons.tv/, but they use their own crypto - making it like Odysee. Why is that?

Edit: Please, before you answer consider this monetisation doesn't mean ads!

23
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 86 points 9 months ago

I don't agree with the tone of the Lemmy devs, but they are right: it's opensource being worked on mostly in the free time of people. Do not treat the devs like they are paid to do your bidding, because they aren't. If you donated and have expectations, you don't understand the meaning of a donation.

Imagine if the author had a woodworking workshop on their compound where they made things out of wood; figurines, furniture, tools, sculptures, and so on. Say they opened it up to the public so that guests could have a look, play around, spend some free time there, and maybe even use the equipment there. But then guest started demanding the author buy newer equipment, make sculptures more to the guest's liking, made the workshop more accessible to invalids, put up the national flag, play the radio, and a host of other things. All the while not footing the bill for anything, not helping clean up, not volunteering to help in any fashion.
Then the author refused and invited the guests to help. But instead, the guests went off and made a blog saying the author was selfish, cold, self-centered, egoistic, rude, and what not.

This is what the author of this article and people in that github discussion come over as. If those people came into my workshop and told me how to do things without helping out in any way, I'd rightfully tell them to fuck right off.

Articles like these that are practically demanding change will not and do not improve the dialogue. They are actually bad for opensource as a whole because they give people who don't understand opensource the feeling that they have the right to complain, the right to demand, the right to expect, the right to be entitled to an opinion and an outcome.

That's a thumbs down from me dawg.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 133 points 1 year ago

Capitalism. As soon as bad PR is over, it's back to business.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 199 points 1 year ago

๐Ÿ‘ OPEN ๐Ÿ‘ SOURCE ๐Ÿ‘ AFTER ๐Ÿ‘ OBSOLETION ๐Ÿ‘

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 82 points 1 year ago

The government better sue the train manufacturer and protect these hackers. The hackers saved the state millions - possibly hundreds of millions.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 94 points 1 year ago

What's up with these trans-memes surrounding linux? Are they just a loud minority?

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 110 points 1 year ago

Oh oh... can we look forward to another wave of reddit leavers after inevitable changes to the site to please investors?

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 106 points 1 year ago

It never ceases to amaze me how people don't read past the title ๐Ÿคฆ There are people debating about -10 to -30C when the article clearly states that it works in those temperatures. Not only does it work, it's twice as efficient as electrical heating at those temperatures.

view more: next โ€บ

onlinepersona

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF