I've gotten so used to school shootings that I see one like that and think "hooray, only four deaths!"
What even is the point of having separate categories of prescription and OTC drugs if there's nothing stopping unapproved drugs from being sold over the counter?
Can we at least agree that people should never be homeless? No?
Can we at least agree that disabled people should never be homeless? Still no?
How about veterans? Once again no.
Disabled veterans with children? Believe it or not, also no.
Anything that makes her mad is probably a good thing.
But if this community community isn't flooded with tech business articles, where are people going to post insightful comments like "fuck Google" and "switch to Firefox"?
If God is punishing us, he's doing it by sending a plague of Republicans.
Signs like that wouldn't be necessary if we weren't living in a hypercapitalist dystopia.
FWIW, Microsoft explicitly allows having multiple jobs. Their policy basically amounts to "don't cross the streams".
Based on what I've read in r/childfree, it's far more common than not for doctors to prioritize the needs of a hypothetical husband or fetus over those of a real live woman. I've also known someone in real life who couldn't get a painful medical condition fixed until her mid 30s because the treatment caused sterility. The problem goes way beyond religion; it's more a matter of institutional sexism and the hubris of doctors thinking they know better than any woman who says she doesn't want kids.
Why are enemies of the United States allowed to own national security infrastructure?
The headline and a lot of the article are trying to give the impression Google is screwing customers out of what they paid for even though the article itself admits they're still going to honor the deal for existing customers. They just won't be extending contracts or writing new ones. Seems like the author is trying really hard to make a mountain out of a molehill.
You know who I think shouldn't be allowed to run? The guy who tried to stage a coup.