[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 11 points 3 days ago

Thank you for the update and it's good to hear your upcoming plans. Being one of those people in Australia (Reddthat) it will be good to see if it actually works as it's designed too!
I'd love to save $7/m to not have a server dedicated to batching the federation traffic ๐Ÿ˜…

When you lay out the timelines for 0.19.3 onwards no time at all has gone by, and having to deal with the issues after .3 has certainly not been fun as an admin. (And I'm only a small server compared!)
Being such a huge player in our Lemmyverse, thanks for taking the time to plan this out as I know how much testing has been done to get us this far.

It's always a nice experience chatting to the LW team!
Hope your updates go smoothly!

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 16 points 3 months ago

This is sso support as the client. So you could use any backend that supports the oauth backend (I assume, didn't look at it yet).

So you could use a forgejo instance, immediately making your git hosting instance a social platform, if you wanted.
Or use something as self hostable like hydra.

Or you can use the social platforms that already exist such as Google or Microsoft. Allowing faster onboarding to joining the fediverse. While allowing the issues that come with user creation to be passed onto a bigger player who already does verification. All of these features are up for your instance to decide on.
The best part, if you don't agree with what your instance decides on, you can migrate to one that has a policy that coincides with your values.

Hope that gives you an idea behind why this feature is warranted.

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

Since the 11th @ 9am UTC, LW has seen a 2 fold increase of activities. If my insider knowledge is right (and math) it's 7req/s average up from 3req/s.

Lucky for both of us we are not subbed to every community on LW but I think we are subbed just enough to be affected.

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Relevant: https://reddthat.com/comment/8316861 tl;dr. The current centralisation results in a lemmy-verse theoretical maximum for of 1 activity per 0.3 seconds, or 200 activities per minute. As total transfer of packets is just under 0.3 seconds between EU -> AU and back.

Edit: can't math when sleepy

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

Should be already fixed. I've logged out and in on Jerboa.

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We rebuilt the Lemmy container with an extra logging patch. Seems build docs need some work? as that's the only difference in the past 1-2 days, except for moving to postgres 16...

Thanks for the ping.

I've gone back to mainline Lemmy. @Morpheus@lemmy.today check now please

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 21 points 1 year ago

It's a sad day when something like this happens. Unfortunately with how the Lemmy's All works it's possible a huge amount of the initial downvotes are regular people not wanting to see the content, as downvotes are federated. This constituted as part of my original choices for disabling it when I started my instance. We had the gripes people are displaying here and it probably constituted to a lack in Reddthat's growth potential.

There needs to be work done not only for flairs, which I like the idea of, but for a curated All/Frontpage (per-instance). Too many times I see people unable to find communities or new content that piques their interest. Having to "wade through" All-New to find content might attribute to the current detriment as instead of a general niche they might want to enjoy they are bombarded with things they dislike.

Tough problem to solve in a federated space. Hell... can't even get every instance to update to 0.18.5 so federated moderation actions happen. If we can't all decide on a common Lemmy instance version, I doubt we can ask our users to be subjected to not using the tools at their disposal. (up/down/report).

Keep on Keeping on!

Tiff - A fellow admin.

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

We (reddthat) would welcome your community. ๐Ÿ˜‰

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

If you don't see create community in the top next to create post, then your home server doesn't allow users to create community

No. You have to have an account on that server. (And have to use that account regularly as well, otherwise you won't see reports about your community)

You make posts.

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 23 points 1 year ago

Don't forget & in community names and sidebars.

Constantly getting trolled by &

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

No reddthat too? ๐Ÿ˜œ

11
TITLE (url)
submitted 1 year ago by ticoombs@reddthat.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml

BODY

[-] ticoombs@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago
view more: next โ€บ

ticoombs

joined 2 years ago