[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

His statement is not aimed at putin or the russians.

If anything it is aimed at "not all russians" types in the west.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago

You don't though. You have zero knowledge about Zelensky beyond some high-level english language news articles. You don't even speak Ukrainian. You've never lived in Ukraine.

You are acting in bad faith. Contrarianism for contrarianism's sake. You are harming the Palestinian cause with your attitude. That's why I said you don't actually care and you're just doing this for theatrics.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, the multiple loyalties thing is complete BS.

If that was the case Zelensky would have evacuated to Lviv as per American recommendations. He is clearly not a person to give up.

And I didn't even vote for him in 2019 (wasn't a big fan of his opponent, but there were other issues at play).

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

This is complete speculation on my part, but I think there is a internal component to Trump's actions.

There was that US comedy show that portrayed Trump as a toddler who was sent to the child's table by his former adviser. Trump then fired the adviser.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago

I am just pointing out that you have no clue what you are talking about.

Your polemics don't really make any sense (if you actually follow official gov relationships between Ukraine and Israel) and you don't even understand the basics of Ukrainian attitudes towards Israel/Palestine.

So why the fuck are you talking about this with such fake confidence?

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

I believe he made a statement about converting to Orthodox Christianity. I personally think this was a political move.

To be honest, I don't think he believes in the religious polemics of Judaism or Ukrainian Orthodox Christianity.

I am talking about the detailed religious polemics. Theological axioms. I am an atheist, but I support the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, smaller (pro-Ukrainian) Christian denominations and Crimean Tartar muslim organizations. I would even go as far as saying the government should support them with tax money.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago

It has. In my family we celebrate Christmas as a secular family event. But we now meet up on the December 25th not on Jan 7th.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 28 points 18 hours ago

I am just pointing out that you have a sophomoric if not outright childish attitude in this thread.

You're basically LARPing. If anything the Ukrainian government (privately) has a more negative attitude towards Israel than the public at large (and even with respect to the Ukrainian public, there arguably has been a change over time).

You don't speak Ukrainian, you've never lived in Ukraine. You have no understanding of Ukrainian attitudes around what's going in Israel/Palestine.

And to be honest, it is reasonable to assume you don't really care about the plight of the Palestinians. It's mostly a theatrical thing for you.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 27 points 19 hours ago

The irony of your approach throughout this thread is that the Palestinians support russian genocidal imperialism.

I say this as a Ukrainian who leans towards the Palestinian side.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

VOA is a better source than most private news agencies in the US, even though it is a government service.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's not true. The beginning of the invasion of Ukraine started with the annexation of Crimea in 2014. This was supported by 84% of the population (consistent across 7 years of polling 2014 to 2021). Even with list experiments to account for preference falsification, the support number largely stays the same at 80%.

And support for the full scale invasion was at 65% in 2022 even with preference falsification adjustments.

And then there is the matter of the russian population: 1. electing a KGB goon in 2000 (considered largely free and fair) 2. Reelecting the KGB goon after he shut down mass market independent media (also free and fair) 3. Supporting the comical Medvedev seat warming plan in 2008 4. Electing putin as leader for life in 2012.

Don't get me wrong, I agree you that Western support has been very weak (if funding is an issue, there was 550 billion in russian assets) and failed to effectively challenge russia.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

It's not just putin though, it is at the very least a strong majority of russian population who are supporters of genocidal imperialism.

And this holds true across every demographic segement (age, income, rural vs. urban, education).

43

A senior Russian official reiterated Russian President Vladimir Putin's insistence that negotiations with Ukraine must be based on the same uncompromising demands he made before the full-scale invasion and at the moment of Russia's greatest territorial gains, despite the fact that Ukraine has liberated a significant amount of territory since then. Russian Federation Council Speaker Valentina Matviyenko stated on December 24 that Russia is open to compromise in negotiations with Ukraine, but that Russia will strictly adhere to the conditions that it laid out during negotiations in Istanbul in March 2022, when Russian troops were advancing on Kyiv and throughout eastern and southern Ukraine.[1] Matviyenko added that Russia would not deviate from these conditions by "one iota."[2] The partial agreement that emerged during the Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul in March 2022 stated that Ukraine would be a permanently neutral state that could not join NATO, and imposed limitations on the Ukrainian military similar to those imposed by the Treaty of Versailles on Germany after World War I, restricting Ukraine's Armed Forces to 85,000 soldiers.[3] Russia's demands at Istanbul were mainly more detailed versions of the demands that Putin made in the months before he launched the full-scale invasion in February 2022, including Ukraine's "demilitarization" and neutrality.[4] Matviyenko is reiterating Putin's demand from his annual Direct Line televised press conference on December 19, and more senior Russian officials are likely to make similar claims to domestic and foreign audiences in coming weeks.[5] ISW continues to assess that senior Russian officials' references to conditions Putin attempted to impose on Ukraine when he believed his full-scale invasion could succeed in a few days in 2022 reflects his projected confidence that he can completely defeat Ukraine militarily despite the tremendous setbacks Ukraine has inflicted on Russian forces since then.

79
32
26
97
21

The insurgents claimed on their Military Operations Department channel on the Telegram app Thursday that they have entered Hama and are marching toward its center.

“Our forces are taking positions inside the city of Hama,” the channel quoted a local commander identified as Maj. Hassan Abdul-Ghani as saying.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an opposition war monitor, said gunmen have entered parts of the city, mainly the neighborhoods of Sawaaeq and Zahiriyeh to the northwest. It added that gunmen are also on the edge of the northwestern neighborhood of Kazo.

“If Hama falls, it means that the beginning of the regime’s fall has started,” the Observatory’s chief, Rami Abdurrahman, told The Associated Press.

Hama is a major intersection point in Syria that links that country’s center with the north as well the east and the west. It is about 200 kilometers (125 miles) north of the capital, Damascus, Assad’s seat of power. Hama province also borders the coastal province of Latakia, a main base of popular support for Assad.

81
87
view more: next ›

Skiluros

joined 1 month ago