How?

They're different things. The OP means electromagnetism, Coulomb's law has nothing to do with quantum mechanics, it's classical physics.

The relation between them is that they're both forces that scale with the inverse square of the distance between the objects. Any force that scales with the inverse square of distance has pretty much the same general form.

Another similarity is that both are incomplete, first approximations that describe their respective forces. The more complete versions are Maxwell's laws for electromagnetism and General Relativity for gravity.

It's electromagnetism you mean, not quantum mechanics.

The Earth will always be here. We, on the other hand...

Here's the energy mix for a regular domestic consumer in the month of October.

It's not so rosy as these kinds of news want you to believe. Greenhouse gas emissions are still embarassingly high.

Learning isn't the same as researching.

We can and should be doing both. Use the money our governments are giving to fossil fuels in subsidies. $7 trillion PER YEAR (that's 11 million every minute) in public subsidies go to fossil fuels. Channel that to nuclear and renewables and there's more than enough to decarbonise the grids with both short- and long-term solutions.

What we definitely should not be doing is closing perfectly working nuclear power plants.

Why would I willingly subject myself to that kind of treatment?

Why would you indeed? That's not a requirement for a relationship.

You need a baseline for a stable power grid, which renewables alone can't provide.

It kind of is, in this community.

That's an issue of your instance, not of Lemmy. Smaller, less populated instances tend to be more stable.