15

I was wondering whether that could cause issues for the limited servers available, like when the mass migration from reddit happened.

I know one account sounds like nothing but as a general practice would it be bad to add more accounts that would be mostly dormant?

And if one does create a throwaway would it be better to delete the account afterwards or leave it be?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Die4Ever@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

I think the usage is what really uses the resources not just the account itself

also 100 accounts being subscribed to a community is basically the same as 1 account being subscribed, it's going to federate the same data either way

Ah. Didnt know that. Thanks.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

To add to what others have said, the real source of load is browsing. It's much better than a few months ago, but it is still the case that users actively on the web frontend is the biggest load.

If you are actively using a single digit number of accounts simultaneously, no issue. A bot farm using 100,000 users simultaneously is a big problem.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

An account is just a small database entry. It probably costs the server less than a post that appears on the front page.

Oh wow I didnt know that. Thats a cool tidbit of information. Thanks

[-] yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 1 points 1 year ago

Not bad. It's normal to have alts on any social media platform

[-] bender@insaneutopia.com 1 points 1 year ago

Limited servers available? Can you elaborate on this?

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
15 points (82.6% liked)

Lemmy

12478 readers
39 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS