173

William W. Chip, who served as the senior counselor at the Department of Homeland Security Secretary during the Trump administration, is the only agent listed for Black America for Immigration Reform. In fact, the registration address he put on the group’s form appears to be his D.C. home. A tax attorney for decades, Chip is a contributor to the Center for Immigration Studies — one of the leading think tanks that advocates for restricting immigration — where he has routinely written about how more immigration could harm Black Americans.

The nonprofit he has helped launch is an attempt to further mainstream that idea, one critics of the argument say is merely an underhanded, if not misleading attempt to try and derail comprehensive reform efforts. In an interview, Chip said that he was merely organizing the group for two Black colleagues on the Center for Immigration Studies board of directors.

The new nonprofit is in the early stages, but the plan is to soon apply for 501(c)(3) status and get a website up and running. The group isn’t initially planning to lobby, Chip said, but it wants to highlight research suggesting less-educated immigrant workers harm less-educated U.S.-born counterparts. Their emphasis will be on Black workers, who they argue face increased competition for jobs. They want to use this argument to push forward restrictionist immigration policies, including requiring businesses to use E-Verify, an online government system that allows employers to check someone’s employment eligibility, as well as efforts to cut back on legal immigration.

While writing about immigration for the Center for Immigration studies for nearly two decades, Chip did not hide his views on race. During 2021, he posted a series of inflammatory posts on Twitter, now known as X, including one tweet that questioned whether Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis officer who killed George Floyd, was racially motivated.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

Simply dumbfounding how many Christians voted and will vote again for the Antichrist.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

As was predicted in that acid trip ending of the Bible. I was kind of getting this book, but then you had to throw that at me. Is this a science-fiction novel now? This is even stranger than the romantic chapter, Song of Something or Other.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Song of Solomon. It's very into tits.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"Babe, your boobs are like deer. Or maybe grapes." — Solomon, the Wise

[-] Maeve@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What are you on about? I made no claims about any book, nor the veracity thereof. I’m pretty sure most North Americans and Europeans are at least peripherally familiar with the teachings of legendary Jesus, and the concept of anti (“opposed to; against) christ which presumably include sayings attributed to.

ETA: and here I was bracing for the “No true Christian” fallacy. Humans are amazing animals.

I will never forget the "Blacks Conservatives" tent at a event that only had white people in it.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Deceptive and repugnant! Wow, that is SO on brand for Trump.

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Now, I've looked into starting a non-profit, and I plan to, once I'm at a point, but to my knowledge you can't single handedly start one, it needs to be a collaboration between two or more people.

Which calls into question why this is pit he'd the way it is. Duder said he was organizing for two colleagues, so did this guy just file the papers and the two black guys are the owners or are all three partners, what's the actual fucking story here and where the fuck is the journalism?

If he's the only agent listed, how the eff is he able to do that? Maybe my understanding is lacking, idk.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
173 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3694 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS