144

At least five of the major candidates, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former Vice President Mike Pence, have endorsed doing away with the Department of Education, a favorite target at August's GOP debate.

Businessman Vivek Ramaswamy has gone a lot further. The list of departments he wants to abolish includes not only the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Nuclear Regulatory Commission but also the Internal Revenue Service -- and even the FBI.

ABC News spoke with half a dozen experts about how eliminating departments would work. They described such pledges as political talking points easier said than done, with some calling the proposals either impractical or unfeasible.

"Some of the implications are either dangerous in terms of the ability of the federal government to fulfill its mission or downright impossible, that is making promises candidates are not going to be able to keep," said Donald Kettl, a professor emeritus at the University of Maryland and former dean of its school of public policy.

"It's a long shot," said Kevin Kosari, a senior fellow at the center-right think tank American Enterprise Institute. "Government agencies have a habit of sticking around."

The idea of dismantling these agencies isn't novel. Republicans have long run on the idea that the federal government is too big and needs to be streamlined. Abolishing the Department of Education, in particular, has been a Republican Party goal since the agency was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter in 1979.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

They want to commit major crimes and need those honest Federal employees out of the way.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

That sounds super important and necessary for like safety of entire cities/states and a really bad idea to get rid of.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

When we sell the nuclear secrets to two bit dictators and pocket the billions of dollars through our good-for-nothing son in law, we don’t want any unnecessary regulations. Do we now?

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I listen here, my GOD DAMN RIGHTS are being infringed if I can’t keep my unregulated nuclear devices… for protection.

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

“Sir! The Sphere-o-boom is not for sale.”

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

INB4 this kid becomes their mascot.

‘It infringes on my child prodigy’s personal expression!’ says the person who’s homeschooling their kids to think the earth is flat and that Noah brought dinosaurs on an ark.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

They’re 70% pandering to trump’s supporters and 30% hoping they can commit similar crimes themselves. 0% for the reasons they’re claiming.

MAGA will happily swallow their excuses, though, and crusade for them.

[-] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

What a bunch of assholes.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

This isn't new. Rick Perry's campaign ended when he couldn't remember which ones he wanted to dismantle.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Then, no kidding, he was put in charge of the one he couldn't remember.

https://www.energy.gov/person/rick-perry

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Except he came to realize the value of that agency. He didn't do the Republican thing where you get in charge of an agency, ruin it, and then claim Democrats are responsible for ineffective governance. He actually advanced its mission.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

Someone needs to press them on WHY they want to eliminate them.

"Job killing regulations!"

"Which regulations, and how are they 'job killing'?"

Reporters have been failing to press this key follow up question for DECADES now.

[-] Mereo@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

They want to have a Disunited States of America.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

That's not even a joke. A unified country is harder to dismantle so you can sell off the parts to the highest bidder.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Someone should run on the platform to abolish the Republican Party.

[-] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

He wanted to get rid of the department of energy. Then Trump made him the head of the DOE and Perry actually found out about all the super important shit they do.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

You replied to the wrong comment, but yeah.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How 'bout we just abolish the GOP instead? Problem solved.

[-] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is America. It's not a longshot idea because this country is lame when it comes to anything other than raping lives for money and power.

[-] June@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Republicans have wanted this for as long as I’ve been alive. I remember my parents talking about it in the early 90’s.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
144 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19077 readers
3274 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS