324
submitted 1 year ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 71 points 1 year ago

One of the subtly weirder conversations I’ve ever had was when someone was whinging about their home country’s dumb driving laws. Curious I enquired further until it became clear they thought everyone should be able to get at least a little tipsy while driving because what else were you supposed to do on the long commute home from work.

Never hated cars and car people more than in that moment. What was weird was I never would have been able to tell that that person held those views.

[-] tetris11@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is illuminating that the problem isn't actually wanting to drink whilst driving, but just to pass the time faster when commuting home. The problem is how Americans have designed their cities, not drinking.

Edit: People, not Americans. Freudian slip.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

They didn't say the person was American...

[-] tocano@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

But the city designer was an American, certainly. There are no other countries/s

[-] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Both workers and bar owners would be better served by supporting public transit than the right to drink drive.

[-] MrLee@aus.social 3 points 1 year ago

@alcoholicorn @maegul
It's why I loved living right in the city, as a young man.

[-] neanderthal@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

To me, the frustrating part about wanting to end car dependence is it doesn't mean they will completely go away. Most of the things that help are better for drivers because they keep impaired and distracted people off the road and allow us to tighten up licensing requirements. So you get less traffic with better drivers. You can also go to a bar and not worry about getting yourself or your car home.

[-] ScotinDub@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Was this around the same time the Dutch were protesting against cars killing their children?

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Early 70's for the Netherlands. So I guess that depends on if you'd call 5 years around the same time.

[-] June@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

In case anyone was like me and curious about the bag, it’s an early breathalyzer called ‘The Drunk-O-Meter’ developed at Indiana University in 1931:

https://www.myiu.org/stories/pride-and-tradition/what-is-a-drunk-o-meter/

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 13 points 1 year ago

Every era had its Nigel Farage, it seems

[-] DrCatface@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

but 70% of accidents are caused by sober drivers...shh the best part of freebird is coming up /s

[-] paNic@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Castle

Barbara Castle was ahead of her time. She also introduced seat belts and speed limits despite great opposition.

In February 1966, Castle addressed Parliament, calling for "a profound change in public attitudes" to curtail increasing road fatality figures, stating: "Hitler did not manage to kill as many civilians in Britain as have been killed on our roads since the war". The statistics bore out; between 1945 and the mid-1960s approximately 150,000 people were killed and several million injured on Britain's roads.

She introduced the breathalyser to combat the then recently acknowledged crisis of drink-driving. Castle said she was "ready to risk unpopularity" by introducing the measures if it meant saving lives. She was challenged by a BBC journalist on The World This Weekend, who described the policy as a "rotten idea" and asked her: "You're only a woman, you don't drive, what do you know about it?" In the 12 months following the introduction of the breathalyser, Government figures revealed road deaths had dropped by 16.5%.

[-] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 10 points 1 year ago
[-] Piers@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile people are trying to argue that the new lower speed limit in residential areas in Wales will somehow be the end of civilization.

[-] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago
[-] DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Fascinating watch!

[-] alp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

67? Why is it in black and white lol

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Short answer, which colour photography and video was around, it was more expensive and lower quality.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
324 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9890 readers
2 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS