https://aussie.zone/post/1903094
Looking into privacytests.org, the main developer behind it is someone who contributes to Brave source code. He may not be officially affiliated with the company, but it would be hard to ignore any sort of bias towards Brave.
(how do you tag someone here?)
Yeah, the tests looked a little suspicious regarding Brave.
According to the founder of the website, Brave's developers have implemented changes specifically targetting issues on this site, and thats why they're rated so highly. I believe if you look back to older releases of the test, you'll see Brave not doing nearly as well.
Stop promoting brave, itβs a scam
and has an a-hole ceo. It uses chromium so double spyware and dependencies
So brave.
This was garbage every time it was posted before, and it's still garbage.
Some of these test cases don't matter if you just use uBlock Origin.
So at a quick glance Librewolf is the best choice for desktop? Does it allow addons or block ads natively?
It comes with uBlock Origins preinstalled, so there's that. Otherwise, it's just a hardened Firefox fork, and as such has the same catalogue of addons
Awesome. Makes me wonder if there's still a reason to use Firefox over Librewolf.
Absolutely. I would never recommend any of these offshoots over stock. You can literally set it up the same exact way if you want, but still get same day security patches and updates.
Fair enough!
Only reasons if heard is faster updates if you use base Firefox (w/ arkenfix user.js). Also the styling (brand icons and such) for librewolf are detectable. Mullvad is better than librewolf for antfingerprinting.
I assume Sync doesn't work for history and bookmarks if its not using the FF servers.
I switched to it a couple weeks ago from FF/arc. No issues so far, and Iβm pretty happy.
Yes it does both of those things, Librewolf is just Firefox pre-configured for privacy. You could use Librewolf or you could configure firefox yourself to be equally private, Librewolf is just taking advantage of the features built into FIrefox but left optional for users.
Do you know of any guides to configure Firefox to be as private as LibreWolf?
Librewolf is a custom version of Firefox, focused on privacy
tor, mullvad, or librewolf i would say
I don't understand the ones where a browser doesn't have the feature so it gets a green dash versus a green check. I'd assume not having a feature should just be considered failing. What's the distinction?
Who watches the watchers.
Either the watchers watch eachother, or the great kraken watches us all
Wish DuckDuckGo was on the list
Its a webview browser so not good for privacy or security and relies on Android webview (a lite chrome widget)
It's in the mobile tab
Vivaldi on why this test is misleading https://vivaldi.com/security/common-questions/#privacytests
Also this doesn't account for the test choosing bad defaults. Defaults aren't as important in vivaldi, as it's made for power users.
if it's made for power users why is it proprietary software? Vivaldi is yet another chromium browser with a fancy skin.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)