107
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Facing a pileup of spending bills and a possible government shutdown, 20 Republican senators led by Sen. Rick Scott (Fla.) say they will delay any legislation moving on the Senate floor that does not relate directly to funding the government.

Scott circulated a letter at the Senate Republican lunch Wednesday warning Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) that GOP lawmakers will not tolerate further delay to the annual appropriations bills, none of which has yet passed the Senate.

“Nothing can stand in the way of this work. For this reason, we the undersigned senators pledge to withhold our support for any vote to proceed to items unrelated to appropriations bills,” the senators wrote.

The GOP senators are warning Schumer not to bring any non-appropriations bills to the Senate floor because they fear that letting the spending legislation pile up until December will inevitably lead to Congress passing another massive omnibus spending package.

“We urge you to present a plan to the Republican Conference for how you intend to pass the remaining appropriations bills and conference them with the House in a manner that respects an open amendment process and which does not end in a December omnibus spending package,” they wrote.

The senators, however, pledged to consider the spending bills “expeditiously” if Schumer commits to a plan for passing them in an orderly way and with an open amendment process.

The signatories include Senate Republican Whip John Thune (S.D.), Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Senate Republican Conference Chairman John Barrasso (Wyo.), GOP Policy Committee Chairwoman Joni Ernst (Iowa) and GOP Conference Vice Chairwoman Shelley Moore-Capito (W.Va.).

Sens. Mike Braun (Ind.), Katie Britt (Ala.), Ted Cruz (Texas), Mike Lee (Utah), Kevin Cramer (N.D.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.), Roger Marshall (Kan.), Eric Schmitt (Mo.), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Tommy Tuberville (Ala.) and Roger Wicker (Miss.) also signed the letter.

Republicans on Wednesday expressed frustration over Schumer’s decision not to bring a spending bill to the floor this week before senators leave for the Columbus Day recess.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the vice chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said she was puzzled why Schumer instead scheduled votes on noncontroversial nominees this week.

Cornyn on Tuesday called for Schumer to cancel the recess so senators would have more time to debate the annual spending days.

“We had 45 days from Saturday to fund the government on an ongoing basis, and the majority leader has chosen to send the members of the Senate home for the next two weeks. It’s outrageous. It’s irresponsible. The American people deserve better,” he said.

Cornyn on Wednesday told Schumer to “quit wasting time” and get moving on the appropriations bills right away.

That sentiment was echoed by the senators who signed Scott’s letter to Schumer.

“There is no more important work for the Senate during this time than debating, amending and passing appropriations bills without resorting to a giant package dumped on the conference right before the December holiday,” they wrote.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] protist@mander.xyz 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This reads like Republicans trying to shift blame from themselves, for shutting down the House and preventing any budget from passing, to Democrats for waiting until the House gets its shit together and can negotiate. You can fully expect these fuckers to make the media rounds the next couple weeks blaming Schumer for not passing a bill that would be DOA due to Republican dysfunction in the House

Also, if you haven't yet, search "Rick Scott Medicare Fraud"

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Yep, this is transparent blame-shifting. There's no point in debating a spending bill that doesn't exist and the GOP just ousted their own Speaker, and there's no reason not to vote on unrelated matters while they wait for the House to get their shit together.

Unfortunately, conservative voters will accept whatever talking points they are fed.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Also, open amendments. So they could take good bills and make them bad bills.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 35 points 1 year ago

So, Scott et al are pretending they can pass a budget without the House?

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Without the house that the GOP beheaded.

[-] jerome@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let the attack on the United States, from the inside continue. We know who the enemy is, we should be taking them out in the most humane way possible maybe

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago

By voting them out?

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago

You may not like Mitch McConnell, But you really won't like Rick Scott.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I really hate that prick.

[-] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

GOP: destroying America, one day at a time.

[-] Perrin42@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills...

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

He worried that Senator Football might actually change his mind on having the military with no leadership due to him being upset about military travel reimbursement?

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Budget bills must originate in the House, correct?

[-] Binthinkin@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Rick Scott send out emails monthly and he is such a shit bag fraud liar it’s not surprising that all Florida politicians resemble Rudy Russo.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The senators, however, pledged to consider the spending bills “expeditiously” if Schumer commits to a plan for passing them in an orderly way and with an open amendment process.

), Katie Britt (Ala.), Ted Cruz (Texas), Mike Lee (Utah), Kevin Cramer (N.D.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.

Republicans on Wednesday expressed frustration over Schumer’s decision not to bring a spending bill to the floor this week before senators leave for the Columbus Day recess.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the vice chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said she was puzzled why Schumer instead scheduled votes on noncontroversial nominees this week.

“We had 45 days from Saturday to fund the government on an ongoing basis, and the majority leader has chosen to send the members of the Senate home for the next two weeks.

“There is no more important work for the Senate during this time than debating, amending and passing appropriations bills without resorting to a giant package dumped on the conference right before the December holiday,” they wrote.


The original article contains 496 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Netrunner@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

While ejecting McCarthy was politically correct, it feels like a lapse in judgement if you actually care about governing this country properly.

If you wonder why, let's see how well this comment ages in 3 months or so.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
107 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19036 readers
4114 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS