111
submitted 1 year ago by Shadow@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] k_rol@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 year ago

Then the YouTube comment section saying how it's our fault since we are close to China. I don't know why I still read them.

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do you still read them? (Edit: I'm not being snarky, I'm curious why)

Every few months I forget why I stopped reading comment sections and dip back into unmoderated comments on news sites. It's awful.

[-] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I think I often hope occasionally reporting comments helps slowly make the platforms better. But it really doesn't seem to 😞

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

At this point, I'm pretty sure I'm a bot too.

[-] LeonenTheDK@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

It's bots all the way down...

I joke but that reminds me of the Dead Internet Theory

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

A long time ago, every comment on YouTube was vitriol. It didn't matter what the video was, every single comment was pure poison. Today you can safely read the comments on videos that don't have political context. Of course anything political is going to be completely overrun with state level astroturfing, extremists, and mouth breathers. Occasionally I'll accidentally read the comments on something political, forgetting that comments should be off-limits for that video.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

You should see the shit Microsoft pulls with MSNBC. Editorialized headlines, and direct comments sections. It's pure toxic garbage, and they jam it down boomer throats by making it the default landing page in Edge (and IE) and that stupid "news and interests" spot on the taskbar that you have to disable.

This being the same company that got themselves into an antitrust lawsuit for bundling IE with Windows 20 years ago. Fucking bonkers how horribly times have changed.

[-] Explodedgrains@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, many people are just pants on head retarded and believe the most recent thing they read.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I believe everything you just said.

[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

Footage really shows how crazy close they are willing to get, that's sketchy as fuck.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Footage doesn't show the escalation process though lol

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Inerceptions always follow a process of escalation. You don't start an interception by going wing-to-wing (also because you don't start your interception in sovereign airspace).

Also, in this case China recognizes that land as theirs and thus that the 12 nm around it are recognized as territorial waters. Thus, it recognizes that Canada intruded on their sovereign airspace... And in that context, China would be well within their rights to shoot the plane down. From what I understand, because it's disputed between China and Japan, Canada asked Japan for permission but not China.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

China has the most batshit, nonsensical territorial claims of any country on earth. They could shoot us down alright, but since everyone else on the planet would agree that it happened in international airspace, they would be really fucking stupid to do so

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Except... That's not at all what people are saying. It would be either Japanese airspace or Chinese airspace. It's not China claiming an island alone. It's China and some other party contesting the claims. Only the Western powers claim it to be international airspace.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 11 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=nc7unKkuI04

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Sabre rattling. They're not going to engage. It's about intimidation. They want reactionaries in North America to sound the alarm and make the first (wrong) move first.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

To make the first move first?!

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
111 points (95.1% liked)

Canada

7280 readers
518 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS