88
One centrist Republican who supported Jordan
The Hill just making shit up
"One Republican, that's shy about being a fascist, who supported Jordan" is a mouthful and redundant though.
True, but at least it doesn't invoke a species that's been extinct since at least 2008 🤷
Ya, pretty sure Liz Cheney was voted out in the last election. And she would not have voted for Jordan.
Also, she's not even a moderate like the Dem leadership is pretending. She's a paleoconservative like her dad who only appears moderate in the company of fascists and lunatics, which is the vast majority of GOP politicians in Washington DC and most states now 😮💨
It's sad that "moderate" in this context means that someone can compromise, work cooperatively, and not resort to lying about other political views.
This is where parliamentary systems can sometimes force cooperation. The US setup kind of pushes towards two parties.
She's a paleoconservative like her dad
Funny. I remember when her dad and his ilk were called "neoconservatives."
Time moves fast in the political realm.
That was Dubya. He pretended to be a new and more compassionate kind of conservative. The Dick never even pretended.
Now he's gonna molest the democratic processes next I suppose
I guess he figures all the death threats from the MAGA chuds will work?
I'm looking forward to a worse showing than the first two. I'm hoping that when he hits 30 lost votes, he will pull his bottom lip over his head and swallow.
Poor Gym. A real bitch to wrestle with reality, innit.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) is marching ahead with his Speakership bid despite increasingly grim signs for his path to the gavel, eyeing another floor vote on Thursday even as GOP lawmakers signal that his opposition is likely to grow.
The tally beat expectations from Jordan supporters, who had predicted he would lose around eight more Republicans, but it also marked the first time in nearly a century that a majority-party Speaker nominee received fewer than 200 votes.
Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) said Wednesday it is his “expectation” that the GOP conference will meet Thursday, which could present Jordan with an opportunity to regroup ahead of a third ballot.
Wednesday morning, before Jordan fell short on the second ballot, Rep. Dave Joyce (R-Ohio) signaled he would introduce a resolution to formally install McHenry as Speaker pro tempore.
Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) said Jordan’s second failed vote “absolutely” further shows that it is time to expand McHenry’s powers, and Rep. Marc Molinaro (R-N.Y.) called that course of action “the most logical solution at this point.”
The Speaker saga is thrusting the House GOP conference into a sea of complicated dynamics as pressure mounts amid a looming government shutdown deadline and a conflict between Israel and Hamas.
The original article contains 1,118 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
88 points (95.8% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3167 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS