277
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

Vice signaling.

Fascists take pleasure in the suffering of others, and pat each other on the back for being as horrible of a human being as possible.

It's no coincidence that they react with glee whenever "41%" is brought up: They want you dead, and they won't be satisfied until every queer person is either killed or put into camps.

Sorry, I'm naive here, what's 41% about?

[-] BadEngineering@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

It's the percentage of trans people who have attempted suicide.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

The percentage of cops who beat their wives.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That's the self reported number. The actual percentage is probably significantly higher.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

Remember when CPAC had a banner that said "We are all domestic terrorists"? This is why.

[-] mars296@kbin.social 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Before I read the article I assumed she was proud of bomb threats against her by libs she pissed off... but no. She is proud she inspired her followers to make bomb threats. What a psycho.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Domestic terrorist

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

No, she's proud she's being blamed for shit she doesn't think she had anything to do with.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Isis style, literally

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago

What happens to these people during the course of their lives to make them this terrible?

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what I want to know. I seriously don't want to believe that so many people are this stupid. I am unfortunately presented with strong evidence daily that there are millions of people who are, in fact, this fucking stupid.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder if she was passed over by a man for some encounter for a trans female. Or maybe she had feelings for a lesbian, but was repressed or was denied by the other person.

Or maybe she was just always a mean girl who never grew the fuck up.

[-] snownyte@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

"Libs of TikTok is a handle for various far-right and anti-LGBT social-media accounts operated by Chaya Raichik a former real estate agent."

Explains everything.

[-] FerolisD@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Realtors are seriously some of the worst people. I used to work with them on the regular, they suck.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

I don’t get it. If the fascists win, she’ll be subjugated with everyone else. Does that bitch not get that?

[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 year ago

You're so wrong. She's obviously going to be considered one of the good ones and left alone.... /s

[-] rob64@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Reminds of me of The Handmaid's Tale: Offred's commander's wife was a TV personality and a vocal proponent of more traditional roles for women, but at the time of the story it's obvious she's been hoisted on her own petard.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So. Check out the top comment.

Edited to include another screenshot showing how many degenerates support this crap.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago
[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

I'm not surprised in the least.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Put this dumb asshole in prison.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Stochastic terrorism. The victims should sue her for everything she has.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Both her and Elon should go to prison.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
277 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS