220
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 172 points 1 year ago

“ Burkhardt's appearance was promoted by SkyTree Book Fairs, a newly formed organization marketing itself as "an alternative to the sexually explicit content distributed in Scholastic's book fairs."”

Hmmm, so this was a marketing ploy?

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 133 points 1 year ago

She's literally their marketing officer

[-] Eh_I@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Why would anyone listen to this degenerate porn-addled lady.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago

To be fair, "Degenerate Porn-Addled Lady" is probably really cool.

This woman, however, is not DPAL and wants to ban books, because she likes the completely unrelated thing: porn. If that's all it takes, I like pizza, so we should ban the Bible.

[-] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sadly, they did:

Burkhardt's gambit has already had an impact. The Conroe school board, after listening to her story, voted to restrict access to Drama, the Scholastic book featuring a kiss, from all students in the 8th grade and below. One of the school board members, Melissa Dungan, suggested replacing Scholastic with SkyTree Book Fairs. "All glory to God," Burkhardt posted in response to the news.

I hope Scholastic sues them into oblivion.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

What an embarrassing thing to put on the resumé

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Redhotkurt@kbin.social 94 points 1 year ago

Yeah, a marketing ploy by a fascist organization:

While SkyTree Book Fairs presents itself as an independent non-profit organization, it appears to be a hastily assembled offshoot of Brave Books, which publishes children's books by right-wing pundits and pseudo-celebrities.

Fuckin gross.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

And there it is, ayup. These people are doing quite the full court press to drag us back into the 50s.

(1950s? Or 1850s. You decide)

Scholastic should sue the living shit out of all of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago

Wait till she actually reads the Bible. She's gonna be sooooo horny after that I tell ya.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

If a simple kiss gives her a porn addiction what does she think of what Lot's daughters did? Worse than a damn Folgers commercial

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I love using that story to counter the "modern books are smut, have kids read the Bible" folks. Either that or the story of Dinah.

To those who don't know it. Dinah was raped. Her rapist decided he wanted to marry her and, being such a "nice guy," asked her brothers for permission. They agreed, but only if he and all men in the town were circumcised. The guy agreed and, being the prince, ordered all men to get circumcised. When all the men were "indisposed," the brothers came in, killed all the men, took the women and children as slaves, and took all their possessions.

Their father, Jacob, was angry with how they acted because they "caused trouble" and it could result in other tribes attacking them. Apparently, he was fine with his daughter being raped because the story just moves on to other things.

So this is just a normal everyday kid's story with rape, theft, and murder! Perfectly acceptable for any child to read because at least two guys didn't kiss!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Ezekiel 23:20 is gonna blow her mind.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Whoa, whoa, TIL the Catholics have translated that verse to say their THRUSTS were like stallions', but every translation I grew up with clearly specified that their emissions/their ejaculate was like horses'. What gives? Which is it!?

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is enough magic in the world for it to be both. Let me have this?

Please?

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's penises and semen all the way down.

[-] Eh_I@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

Check out Song of Solomon, it's literally straight-up smut.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So she's not even objecting to LGBT+ content specifically? She's against all kissing in books? So no Snow White? No Frog Prince?

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Y'all Qaeda

[-] Ace0fBlades@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It's likely just a nothing excuse to ban the scholastic book fair and replace it with the "faith based children's" books company mentioned in the article.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

When queer people said that they’d be coming for y’all’s romantic expression next we really didn’t expect it to be so dang quick

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

No bible, even, but we all know that consistency is never a problem for these dopes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 year ago

Of course it's a plant by a right-wing org.

Scholastic fairs were amazing when I was in school. Good to see that they are still in operation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reminder that "porn addiction" is not a thing. Sexual addiction is, porn addiction was invented by conservative/religious weirdos who think masturbation is "sinful." Religions are especially glib about calling things "porn and addiction" without justification. They want you to think you're sick, so they can provide you the "cure."

Just because you enjoy looking at porn and/or masturbating regularly doesn't mean you have a sexual addiction. If you have trouble maintaining employment or relationships because of your habits, you might, and you should talk it over with a secular licensed psychologist to make that determination and decide the best way to address it.

Edit: for anyone that wants to take umbrage at the fact that "sex addiction" isn't in the latest DSM-V from 2013, here's a 2019 review from psychology scholars: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C44&q=porn+addiction&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1701288070891&u=%23p%3DNjIPuUqk95kJ

And one from 2020: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=11094516847889822262&as_sdt=5,44&sciodt=0,44&hl=en#d=gs_qabs&t=1701288571080&u=%23p%3Dz2RDDmDZK2AJ

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 39 points 1 year ago

The Conroe school board, after listening to her story, voted to restrict access to Drama, the Scholastic book featuring a kiss, from all students in the 8th grade and below.

Bruh, in 8th grade the girl sitting next to me in science class told me she liked the smell of my pubescent BO and offered to blow me under the lab bench. Also in sex ed I had a very clear view of some girl giving her boyfriend a foot job under the table. Also 9/11 happened that year. I'll give you three guesses which one was the most traumatic.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

she liked the smell of my pubescent BO and offered to blow me under the lab bench. Also in sex ed I had a very clear view of some girl giving her boyfriend a foot job under the table

that's not sexualizing kids, though. it's only sexualizing kids if it's queer.

[-] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, everyone got called a fag at least once a week. I'm sure none of us ended up gay. Also there was one black kid and he got arrested for weed.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

oh it's not been so long that I've forgotten that being a cis boy in school consists 99% of shouting about how everyone except you is gay. "the lady doth protest a lot and is therefore probably telling the truth" and all

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

Damn, I went to the wrong school.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So apparently this woman works for a competing (fringe right wing) book publisher. In which case Scholastic might have grounds to sue.

[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Way to admit your mind is as strong as wet paper.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

It's a slippery slope from learning that love and romance exists to porn addiction and blowing homeless dudes in an alley. This is why we must never teach children that affection exists. Only hate.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago
[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

She (didn't) got better

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Surprisingly, that book was not one of the Captain Underpants series

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One time I read a book with the word "the" in it. Man, the dark places that took me. (/s if not obvious).

Where on earth do the book-banning nutjobs find these other nutjobs?

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Wherever home-schoolers congregate, I imagine.

[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Lmao. For me, I just have a love for those anatomical books that peal back a layer, everytime you turn the page.

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Jesus that's a slippery slope

[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Debilitating addictions are an illness. Should we kill all of the bees because some people are severely allergic? I can understand the mysterious woman feeling that way, but the sane response is treatment of the few susceptible, not prohibition for all the rest.

She's the marketing officer for a right-wing competitor to Scholastic. I am doubtful she has a porn addiction in the first place, and I'm 100% sure it wasn't "sparked" by Scholastic books for kids. And if it was, I submit her problem is different than she thinks it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

Bees, casinos, the sun, peanuts, bullets, humans, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
220 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS