335
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 53 points 10 months ago

Shooting at a fighter aircraft while in a parachute seems like a very bad idea to me, you're in trouble if the pilot shoots back.

[-] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 75 points 10 months ago

Odds are if a fighter is close enough for a pistol then the fighters were committing war crimes by shooting parachuting aviators. The Japanese were known for shooting down parachutes.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

It wasn't a war crime back then, of course.

[-] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 10 months ago

What I've learned about "war crimes" is that it doesn't matter what you do as long as you don't lose. And if you win you get to punish the loser for their war crimes and pretend like you didn't commit any.

[-] manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com 21 points 10 months ago

Japan lost and they still deny the horrible, Holocaust-tier atrocities they committed during WW2

[-] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 10 months ago

They didn't lose hard enough

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

IDK, they unconditionally surrendered. That pretty much never happens.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 10 months ago

And yet we didn't execute any of the people responsible.

[-] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

"History get written by the victors"

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -2 points 10 months ago

A statement routinely banned in serious historical communities because of the mountains of evidence against it

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

It was the guy in the parachute who was shooting back. The Japanese were known for shooting down ejected pilots.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They're moving pretty quickly relative to you. By the time they realize you've shot at them, they'll be hundreds of meters away. If they then decide to turn around (since they have to be facing you to shoot you) and come for another run at you...honestly they were probably going to do it anyway.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Iirc he shot at the Japanese pilot because he was shooting pilots who had already bailed which is an unwritten rule of fighter combat.

[-] Lionel@endlesstalk.org 16 points 10 months ago

How did they confirm this? (I don’t doubt it but still)

[-] nuke@yah.lol 24 points 10 months ago

Supposedly, the plane was later found after crashing, the pilot with a bullet wound in his head

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/the-japanese-fighter-plane-shot.html

[-] Land_Strider@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Ah, plausible explanation for a crashed pilot that needs to be dead, I see.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

During WW2, the Japanese were shooting airmen who have ejected. This was a MAJOR no no in wartime. So the only reason a Japanese plane would have been in striking distance from an ejected airman, would be because the Japanese airman was trying to kill him.

Another fun fact. During war, snipers don't ever shoot a person who is taking a shit.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

I am going to need a source for your fun fact. That sounds like shit.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Here is the source for the parachutes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_parachutists

For the pooping in thing, after doing a bunch of research, the "rule" was mostly memoirs and interviews about what the West did. This could be an attempt to rewrite history to make the West look better. But here are a couple of sources I found.

During the civil war: https://dailycaller.com/2017/01/10/civil-war-rule-of-engagement-protected-urinating-with-pants-down-dont-shoot-principle/

Short video about it: https://youtube.com/shorts/PhWraPN46jc?si=OYHA-bM0OE27Zr_f

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] corrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] nuke@yah.lol 26 points 10 months ago

Who throws a pistol? Honestly!

[-] corrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

i mean how else hed do anything useful with 1911

[-] nuke@yah.lol 20 points 10 months ago
[-] corrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

youd wish i liked mk18! because i like ac556!

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure if that is pro or anti 1911.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Fight me.

Seriously though, it's my favorite not just because it's classic, it's the handgun I'm best at. By a long shot.

[-] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"ON CRIP, ON GOD, HE DID THAT SHIT"

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
335 points (98.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6530 readers
379 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS