170
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 108 points 10 months ago

It is a major turnaround for Musk, who previously said he wouldn’t let Jones back on the platform despite repeated calls to do so. Last year, Musk pointed to the death of his first-born child and tweeted, “I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame.”

Thankfully for him, his sycophants have the memories of goldfish.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Musk pointed to the death of his first-born child

He lied about his first-born dying in his arms, to win an internet argument:

Elon Musk’s ex-wife refutes his claim that firstborn child died in his arms ... ‘And not that it matters to anyone except me, because it is one of the most sacred and defining moments of my life, but I was the one who was holding him’

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/justine-musk-elon-musk-dying-son-b2234938.html

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

It’s easy, considering his knobgobblers are the same sort of people who make up shit to forgive Trump for everything possible. They just have to tell themselves “well Alex Jones didn’t do that, he was framed by LIBRULS”

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

"...I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children..."

Apparently he has mercy for such people now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 14 points 10 months ago

Kinda like the time he said he wouldn't ban the jet guy and then did like 3 days later.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

I remember some people saying, "nah, you don't see it from his perspective, if your son's life was in trouble and you owned the platform, you'd do the same thing"

I kinda hate that logic because it assumes I'd say the stupid shit enough to put myself into that situation. Not to mention his family's life wasn't actually in danger.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Several people posted proof of him lying about that also, but even if he wasn't, the only thing that changed was he got a full helping of how "free speech absolutism" personally affects him, and maybe that it's not such a great idea?

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Goldfish have long memories.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

That'll bring those high-dollar advertisers back to Twitter! Good work!

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Still a long way to go to be considered a "free speech absolutist".

He has failed since the start on that front.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago

I'll start considering his claim of being a "free speech absolutist" when he unbans the account that uses publicly available information to track his private plane.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 38 points 10 months ago

FYI, he's still tracking Elon's jet, on Mastodon now. @elonjet

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I check in every so often out of curiosity. He took a 9-minute flight last year.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

His aircraft took a 9 minute flight. Elon was not necessarily on board. Sometimes aircraft are moved for logistical reasons.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 2 points 10 months ago

OMG please let him overestimate his skill as a pilot

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I doubt he pilots them himself.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah that era of billionaire is unfortunately over. Now they just think they’re engineers for some reason.

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Someone start telling him how much of a badass Tom Cruise is for doing his own stunts.

"Elron, Tom Cruise can ride a motorcycle off a cliff and pop a parachute! Can you do that?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radix@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

And stops suing journalists for doing journalism.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago
[-] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Lmao and the "critical" customer still slobbered all over Elon's cock afterwards.

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I don’t think anyone serious or sensible believed that Elton was out to achieve that.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Elton

Well, he is the Rocket Man

[-] kitedemon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

Read this as “free speech abolitionist”

[-] fhek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 10 months ago

Checkmate, advertisers!

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

He hadn’t already?

[-] Guajojo@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I'm now convinced he has been replaced by an AI that has been fueled on Reddit comments

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Knowing Elon and how he has changed this is not too surprising.

[-] Iapar@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

He hasn't changed. He just broke the one rule rich people have. "Don't talk to poor people".

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Damn thing tanked

Democrats did it*

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
170 points (90.9% liked)

News

23070 readers
3283 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS