If a headline is phrased as a question, i.e. "Will X takeover the world this month?", then the answer is always no, because if the answer was yes they would have written "X will takeover the world by the end of the month" which is a much more declarative and attention grabbing headline.
Similarly, if a headline says something "could do X" that means it won't because if it was going to the reporter would have written that it "will do X".
Described well. Link to the relevant wikipedia article:
Headline: Studies show French toast may cause cancer.
Then again, it may not.
Why are you picking on the French? If I had my guess, I would assume Texas toast would be worse in that regard. Lol
All toast matters
Since it contains burnt byproducts, it probably does. Like 0.001% more chance of cancer per toast per hour or something.
It won't ever be your cell phone screen. Optically, it's less clear than what we have, and while the wood/epoxy is "tough", wood is not "hard". It will scratch easily.
It’s an interesting line of research, but unless they can completely remove all visual traces of grain, etc, so that it’s very clear, it’s not going to be a replacement for glass in either screens or windows. And I’m skeptical that’s possible.
I've got a couple frosted windows that I'd love to be as insulating as wood, I can see it maybe being used for that.
It would also be useful for blinds. My doggie is a bit of a little jerk and wrecked mine trying to look outside while they were closed. Wood blinds would likely be a lot more resilient
Honestly, I'd take a woody window to replace the clear glass overlooking the scenic parking lot outside literally any of the apartments I've ever lived in.
If it's anything like NileRed's "transparent wood" it won't work for shit as a window, except as like a privacy window that just lets light through.
"Could".
Could. Should. Wood.
An iPhone user will still break it.
Wood is wood and wood breaks.
Not bad.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
