611

The all-white school board voted 5-2 to stop offering Black history and literature courses.

A Missouri school board that previously voted to rescind an anti-discrimination resolution has voted in favor of removing elective Black history and literature classes.

The seven-member Francis Howell School Board voted 5-2 Thursday night to stop offering Black History and Black Literature courses, which had been offered at the district’s three high schools since 2021, KSDK reported. All seven members of the board are white.

“Our students really wanted these electives,” Harry Harris, whose son is a student in the district, said during the board meeting. “Our families really wanted them and our teachers really wanted them. It’s important. It’s been great.”

In July, the conservative-led board revoked an anti-racism resolution that had been passed in 2020 following the police killing of George Floyd.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago

Growing up in Indiana, they didn't teach black history, and I turned out just fine except for not knowing about Jim Crow or the Tuskegee syphilis experiment or redlining or the Tulsa race massacre or Ruby Bridges, or lynching, or Malcolm X or the Black Panther movement or the MOVE bombing or...

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

I grew up in Wyoming. We didn't get most of that well...

We did hear about lynching and Malcolm X. Not much in details about either, mind, but we were told that both had existed. They glossed over anything that Malcolm X stood for, or actually said, or did....

As for lynching... We learned the word.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The people of Tulsa didn't know about the Tulsa Race Massacre. Until that HBO show Watchmen I never heard of it.

Ask my wife who was born and raised here and my ex wife both had no clue and they went to school in the Tulsa area.

It fucked up but Until HBO shine a light on it they had plan to never educate anyone about it.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I grew up in the north east and went to a very good public school and never learned about ANY of that until I went to college/uni and started taking real history courses.

[-] dakial@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Is black history not taught inside the main history classes? Slavery, civil rights, etc etc? What is the argument for these classes?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They say it disappeared in the 1920s. It didn't. It just went underground.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Klan

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It is not - "main" history classes gloss over "messy" details. You should see what we don't learn about Christopher Columbus, for example.

[-] dakial@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You mean the guy who was too Evil even for the spanish monarchy?

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

Removal of black history classes completes the erasure of generations of racial terrorism against black people, of course they want that.

A policy of denying racial inequity and preventing the truth from being told about it is the very definition of structural racism.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 35 points 1 year ago

I'm reminded of a guy I knew (who wasn't even white!) that had a sort of "racism is over" attitude. I was like, "Ok, let's look at one very specific part of racism in the US. Do you know what redlining is?" He did not. I explained it, and generational wealth transfer. Then he was like, "Oh. Yeah, I guess that would still have an effect today." Made a big crack in his world view with one twenty minute talk.

Of course conservative shitheads don't want this stuff taught. They don't want that kind of eye opening happening all over the place.

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

The south was not burned enough during the civil war.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 64 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately what gets considered as "The South" is actually anywhere in the country more than ~30 minutes outside of any Metropolitan area. It's not North VS South, it's urban v rural, and Big Ag dropped a fuck load of money a long time ago to ensure land votes harder than people.

[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago

As someone who somewhat recently moved to California, it was shocking to see how conservative anywhere outside of urban areas is. Like California is seen as this haven of progressiveness, but that's only because we have two of the biggest cities in the country.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

There are more people who voted for Trump in California than in Texas. There are just a LOT of people in California. But there are also a lot of republicans.

[-] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It’s not North VS South, it’s urban v rural

IMHO it's compassionate vs cruel. And like the paradox of tolerance, showing compassion for the cruel is the way to a cruel world.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately Lincoln severely hampered the radical reconstruction movement, and then Johnson absolutely killed it.

Recommended reading: "Black Reconstruction in America" is a really great book that covers this kind of stuff. It's by Dr. W.E.B. DuBois

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The political and military leadership of the Confederacy should have been executed, the statehood of traitor states should have been stripped, and the whole region placed under martial law with military governors appointed. That's how Reconstruction should have went. I don't think there was ever the will to do that to "fellow Americans" though. Especially on behalf of people that, at the time, were still largely considered "less than," even in the Union.

[-] Argurotoxus@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

It's a bummer. This is the district I went to high school in, and it was a fantastic district while I was there. It had its issues but I got a great education.

It's truly depressing to see this kind of mentality take hold in my community. Sadly I live in a different school district now so I couldn't have even voted against these board members, but I definitely had to vote down my fair share of people just like them in my local district.

Man you just really hate to see it. I hope this inspires a reaction that will ultimately oust these people before they can do irreparable damage.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Talking to a family friend who's still in the area, I frankly can't say it surprises me at all.

[-] Ameripol@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm with you, it's really disappointing seeing it get this bad. It feels like Missouri has been trying it's hardest to catch up to Texas and Florida, in fighting the culture war. Example: one of the Republican candidates for governor wants to get rid of the state's department of education.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago

Missouri should vote to remove the school board.

[-] CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So they have a handicap. That shouldn’t stop them.

Haven't been to Missouri, huh?

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I see no reason to.

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Damn, I guess we'll have to get all or our history knowledge from more statues then.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

So much white resentment.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

I misread the headline as "Mussolini School Board" and, well, I wasn't that far off.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

While nice to know white guilt effected 2 of them, perhaps white guilt isn't the mechanism for addressing this?

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

But they are NOT Racist!

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
611 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19248 readers
3019 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS