Growing up in Indiana, they didn't teach black history, and I turned out just fine except for not knowing about Jim Crow or the Tuskegee syphilis experiment or redlining or the Tulsa race massacre or Ruby Bridges, or lynching, or Malcolm X or the Black Panther movement or the MOVE bombing or...
I grew up in Wyoming. We didn't get most of that well...
We did hear about lynching and Malcolm X. Not much in details about either, mind, but we were told that both had existed. They glossed over anything that Malcolm X stood for, or actually said, or did....
As for lynching... We learned the word.
The people of Tulsa didn't know about the Tulsa Race Massacre. Until that HBO show Watchmen I never heard of it.
Ask my wife who was born and raised here and my ex wife both had no clue and they went to school in the Tulsa area.
It fucked up but Until HBO shine a light on it they had plan to never educate anyone about it.
To be fair, I grew up in the north east and went to a very good public school and never learned about ANY of that until I went to college/uni and started taking real history courses.
Is black history not taught inside the main history classes? Slavery, civil rights, etc etc? What is the argument for these classes?
They say it disappeared in the 1920s. It didn't. It just went underground.
It is not - "main" history classes gloss over "messy" details. You should see what we don't learn about Christopher Columbus, for example.
You mean the guy who was too Evil even for the spanish monarchy?
Removal of black history classes completes the erasure of generations of racial terrorism against black people, of course they want that.
A policy of denying racial inequity and preventing the truth from being told about it is the very definition of structural racism.
I'm reminded of a guy I knew (who wasn't even white!) that had a sort of "racism is over" attitude. I was like, "Ok, let's look at one very specific part of racism in the US. Do you know what redlining is?" He did not. I explained it, and generational wealth transfer. Then he was like, "Oh. Yeah, I guess that would still have an effect today." Made a big crack in his world view with one twenty minute talk.
Of course conservative shitheads don't want this stuff taught. They don't want that kind of eye opening happening all over the place.
The south was not burned enough during the civil war.
Unfortunately what gets considered as "The South" is actually anywhere in the country more than ~30 minutes outside of any Metropolitan area. It's not North VS South, it's urban v rural, and Big Ag dropped a fuck load of money a long time ago to ensure land votes harder than people.
As someone who somewhat recently moved to California, it was shocking to see how conservative anywhere outside of urban areas is. Like California is seen as this haven of progressiveness, but that's only because we have two of the biggest cities in the country.
There are more people who voted for Trump in California than in Texas. There are just a LOT of people in California. But there are also a lot of republicans.
It’s not North VS South, it’s urban v rural
IMHO it's compassionate vs cruel. And like the paradox of tolerance, showing compassion for the cruel is the way to a cruel world.
Unfortunately Lincoln severely hampered the radical reconstruction movement, and then Johnson absolutely killed it.
Recommended reading: "Black Reconstruction in America" is a really great book that covers this kind of stuff. It's by Dr. W.E.B. DuBois
The political and military leadership of the Confederacy should have been executed, the statehood of traitor states should have been stripped, and the whole region placed under martial law with military governors appointed. That's how Reconstruction should have went. I don't think there was ever the will to do that to "fellow Americans" though. Especially on behalf of people that, at the time, were still largely considered "less than," even in the Union.
It's a bummer. This is the district I went to high school in, and it was a fantastic district while I was there. It had its issues but I got a great education.
It's truly depressing to see this kind of mentality take hold in my community. Sadly I live in a different school district now so I couldn't have even voted against these board members, but I definitely had to vote down my fair share of people just like them in my local district.
Man you just really hate to see it. I hope this inspires a reaction that will ultimately oust these people before they can do irreparable damage.
Talking to a family friend who's still in the area, I frankly can't say it surprises me at all.
I'm with you, it's really disappointing seeing it get this bad. It feels like Missouri has been trying it's hardest to catch up to Texas and Florida, in fighting the culture war. Example: one of the Republican candidates for governor wants to get rid of the state's department of education.
Missouri should vote to remove the school board.
But it's Missouri.
So they have a handicap. That shouldn’t stop them.
Haven't been to Missouri, huh?
I see no reason to.
Damn, I guess we'll have to get all or our history knowledge from more statues then.
So much white resentment.
I misread the headline as "Mussolini School Board" and, well, I wasn't that far off.
While nice to know white guilt effected 2 of them, perhaps white guilt isn't the mechanism for addressing this?
But they are NOT Racist!
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News