483
submitted 1 year ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago

Honestly after the Cyberpunk debacle I can easily see why, the decisions that led to that were almost certainly made by marketing and C-Suite and not the devs. Someone correct me if that’s wrong. If they actually learn from those mistakes I have no doubt they’ll reclaim the rep they had after the Witcher 3

[-] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

Honestly they've already reclaimed a lot of rep fixing cyberpunk, especially after the 2.0 update.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

I think they’ve done a great job with that and I really enjoyed Cyberpunk, I mean more with the vast majority of the public there’s still gonna be a stigma whether it’s fair or not. That debacle was really damn visible, undoing that damage in totality is gonna take a new release without those major issues imo

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm hoping the stigma we see, towards cdpr and literally every other game dev studio, is people stop preordering shit. Problem solved, devs get money when we get a good game.

[-] troydowling@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I picked it up on the Steam winter sale. Been waiting to play this one for so long and can't wait!

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I'm currently enjoying it and yeah it's pretty fucking good :)

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I haven't really played cyberpunk at all even though I own the game

Is it even worth playing ?

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

It's what a Bethesda game would be if they gave a shit.

So yeah, especially if you already own it.

[-] MajesticSloth@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I think it absolutely is. I played it a bit at launch and didn't find it near as bad as others but still set it aside. Started it fresh again with the expansion, and I had such a blast with it. You own it, so I see no reason not to a least give it a try.

[-] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Oh, absolutely, it's a completely different experience now than on launch. It's a properly good RPG nowadays, although your choices don't matter much in the storyline.

[-] _Lory98_@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

Yea it's worth playing now. It's not a masterpiece, but it's fun enough.

[-] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It was still a good game at launch, just buggy and didn't live up to expectations.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. Absolutely. It IS a masterpiece at this point. So much of the game has changed since release that it's like, barely the same game compared to release, and all of it for the better (except fixing the super speed with krez big, that was just fun cdpr whhyyyyy)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kraivo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They will not. What happened with Cyberpunk happened with Gwent before and nobody gave a single fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jackpot@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago
[-] kwozyman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The top level management: CEO, CFO, CTO etc. Basically, the big bosses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

i think that's a smart move on their part.

the CP2077 launch was rocky, but most of their previous games haven't had that level of hype. The Witcher 3 taking off like it did, gave them the confidence to go bigger. CP2077 is in a great place now, even if it didn't start that way.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly, maybe they're just playing hard to get in order to raise the offer?

"Sure maybe we're worth about that... but think about what we might be worth in a few years."

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I'm still sad about Gwent, though. The only reasonably priced CCG I've played, with beautiful artwork and fun decks.

As soon as Marvel Snap dropped, it sucked out whatever remaining air the game had left and even the smaller streamers dropped out of sight.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 33 points 1 year ago

They're almost certainly right.

Cyberpunk wasn't received well, but they seem to have No Man's Sky'd it into some sort of shape since.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] 0xtero@beehaw.org 29 points 1 year ago

It would be nice if the entire world didn't consolidate into two mega corps. Good on CDR for having their own vision.
CP2077 + Phantom Liberty are excellent. I just started a new playthrough. I wish it had released in this shape.

[-] Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Good. Not every studio needs to be snatched up by a massive corporation. Embracer's yearlong meltdown is a great example of how that can end badly.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Every company that gets bought by another corporation either cranks out a few good games and then dies, or cranks out an okay game and then dies. The eventual outcome is always death.

Bullfrog, Raven, Westwood Studios, Bioware, Origin, Maxis, Viceral Games, all of them.

[-] Zibitee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can add blizzard to that list. That merger practically killed the studio anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I doubt it. They laid off 9 percent of the staff this July. That's far away from the 2077 launch. I would guess it's after the majority of Phantom Liberty's development is done.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

Layoffs are only a bad sign for workers. For the owners and investors, it's the standard strategy for growth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Excellent. I'm eager to see the doings.

[-] jackpot@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

they need to fire their whole ai department and theyll be flying lmfao

[-] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I believe it. Lessons learned and all

[-] gnubyte@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

oh I thought MSFT already owned them. I guess not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Please correct me if I *have the wrong impression here but how much does a sentiment like this matter if some big bethesda shaped behemoth makes the moves to acquire? Wouldnt business sense dictate that you sell if the offer is juicy enough?

[-] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe the owners care more about running a sustainable company that makes good games than they do about getting a bunch of money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The videogame world is weird. Say you are a small buisness in a miner town making cast and hardened steel parts for mining equipment. If a big manufacturer comes around and offers to buy you out, your alternative to saying "yes" is them, opening up their own buisness and driving your sales into the ground with cheaper offers. But if Bethesda says to CD Project RED "Either you accept the acquisition or we are going to make better games." CDPR can just say "Haha, good luck."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Fucking Based

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
483 points (99.0% liked)

Gaming

20180 readers
7 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS