98
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by pop@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

So I was going through /all and this admin is snooping at vote counts for posts in his instance and then posting it publicly.

Just a reminder that these kind of petty people exist. Pick a trustworthy instance or better yet, host your own.

Archive: https://archive.md/oybyL

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 98 points 11 months ago

The votes are public. Kbin displays them right in the UI. Lemmy semi-hides it, but it's never been designed to be private in any way.

Changing instance won't do shit if that's a concern to you. As an admin I can see them even if my instance isn't involved with the post at all:

[-] skankhunt42@lemmy.ml 23 points 11 months ago

So really, I just need to host my own instance to see votes. Nice.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 33 points 11 months ago

Meet new friends, find new foes!

A table of downvotes

What's the worst that could happen?

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Oh boy.

Brigading is back on the menu boys! /s

(Don’t actually do this)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pop@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

didn't know that. thanks!

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 95 points 11 months ago

To illustrate op's point I'm going to spin up an instance, federate with everyone, and not tell anyone what that instance is.

Then I'm going to feed all that data into my new website, called Open Lemmy Stats, where anyone can query the user data ive accumulated. The homepage will be ripe with insights, leaderboards and all kinds of data on prolific users.

Additionally, I'll display a snapshot/profile of a random user by feeding that users data to GPT4 to make inferences about the user's political affiliations and display the results.

Worst of all, I'm not going to out my instance for everyone to know it as the one to defederate. In fact I'm spinning up a few instances that will host innocuous communities that I plan to mod and support to give my instances cover for their true purpose: redundant fediverse datastreams for my site, Open Lemmy Stats.

I'll also have a store where anyone can buy my collected fediverse data for a handsome sum.

Just kidding I'm not doing any of this. But someone absolutely will or already is.

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 17 points 11 months ago

Is the fact that I recognize this comment evidence that I use Lemmy a bit too much? 😅

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Caught in 4k ~~stealingq~~ liberating a really good comment

[-] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 10 points 11 months ago

How to work out what instance(s) if someone does this: A Lemmy instance doesn't have to send the same voting data to every instance, it could send different votes to different instances (stock Lemmy federates the same thing consistently, but there is no reason a modified Lemmy designed to catch someone doing this has to), encoding a signal into the voting pattern. Then, just check to see what signal shows up. If it averages several instances, with enough signal you could decompose a linear combination (e.g. average) of different patterns back out into its constituent parts.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

All of which begs the question why are we bothering to pretend any of this is actually democratic or that the fediverse is truly unified across instances.

On a fundamental level, this "choose your voters" thing breaks the integrity of the voting system. I understand why it needs to happen to combat rogue instances, but the level of manipulation and silent curation that is possible, without the average user's knowledge, means no one can trust the numbers they see on any instance.

There's just so many avenues for abuse here, and it's disheartening to not see more acknowledgement of that from the devs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clever_banana@lemmy.today 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Please do this. Its really not an issue.

The solution is simply to use anonymous accounts and change them frequently. This should be more publicized as normal lemmmy data hygene

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

So 4chan but with extra steps...

Has Lemmy already jumped the shark.

[-] clever_banana@lemmy.today 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wut? The data is already public. Why only allow the bad guys to access it and not everyone?

Everything you do online will be used against you unless you do so anonymously. This isn't a Lemmy problem. Its only specific to Lemmy if we as a community dont inform each other of the risks and encourage safe data hygienic practices

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 68 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Every up and down vote you make is public. Friendica, kbin, and mbin all expose who voted on every post to any user, and anyone tech savvy on any software can dig out the totals at any time.

In my mind the UI should make this very obvious (honestly I think there should be a pop-up that warns new users of this every time they vote until they check a box to disable it), because it's not what people expect. But votes are very public.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In my mind the UI should make this very obvious (honestly I think there should be a pop-up that warns new users of this every time they vote until they check a box to disable it), because it's not what people expect. But votes are very public.

Which de-incentivizes voting, choking off the thing needed to aggregate the content. Kind of underlining the problem with the votes being public.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 15 points 11 months ago

Votes pretty much have to be public in order for the whole federated system to work -- otherwise anyone could just stuff 50 votes for their favorite comment, and there'd be no way to tell where they came from. Given that, I think it's important that the software be honest with people about the situation, "disincentive" or not. Personally I'm fine with my votes being public, but an important part of that is that I know they're public and can vote accordingly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Lol:

"All those account outside of monero.town are most likely angry commies that just follow posts from here to downvote."

People outside my echo chamber think I'm an asshole, it must be a conspiracy!

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We do see the votes. Publicly posting them sounds like poor form, but then what do you expect from crypto bros?

Pick a trustworthy instance or better yet, host your own.

Running your own instance isn’t going to hide your votes.

[-] On@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

I'm curious, If I delete my account periodically, are the profile and activity like comments/votes still out there in other instances? are votes deducted? I'm not sure if this is the right question but does deleting accounts federate?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

I’m not one to half-ass it, so someone more knowledgeable than me will have to field these.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

I am not sure about the details of intended behaviour but it certainly won't federate to anyone deliberately disabling that part of federation so for privacy purposes you might as well assume that it doesn't federate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 37 points 11 months ago

Guys. The person running the website you use always can do and see everything

This has nothing to do with lemmy

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 7 points 11 months ago

I think the main complain anyone would have with this is, only we admin can look at the vote, and no one else can. This isn't a problem in Kbin or any other platform that allow one to do so.

I only check the vote to see if there's any brigading, other than that, i have no issue with other admins snooping or whatever. Ohh to be clear, all of us admin can see the vote everywhere, getting a new instance yourself will not solve anything.

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

A new PR allowing mods to see the votes was merged a few weeks ago.

[-] Maestro@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why not allow anyone to see the votes? Anyone already can by using kbin or spinning up their own instance.

[-] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 11 months ago

I think there is an assumption that is rooted in how reddit worked, that votes are anonymous. People operating under that assumption might not like having that blanket ripped off. It would be different if it was up front from the start.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but for that you have to open a ticket suggesting that.

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Oh good, Lemmy had no privacy. Not like that ability isn't going to be abused.

Either make it public right from the start everyone sees everything. Or make this crap not possible.

You're going to get echo chambers that start witch hunts. Someone is going to dox someone because they don't like how someone votes... Yadda yadda someone gets swatted or someone just shows up... Then someone's going to start cheering "We did it Lemmy!"...

Honestly at least with Reddit you had one single evil entity that would abuse their power and trust of users.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

That's an interesting point. One company, like Reddit, might see human beings as nothing more than content mills, but that created incentives to be a little private at least.

Lemmy servers are run by anybody, including Facebook, and you don't even have to accept someone else's server rules for your data to transfer onto it. The process occurs passively.

What's the instance?

Or is it right in front of my face and I'm not seeing it?

[-] Limitless_screaming@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

From what I understand votes are publicly available data, Lemmy just chooses to hide them to prevent the "chilling effect" where people feel afraid to vote honesty for fear of repercussions. Then they reintroduced it for admins so they can do their duties in stopping vote manipulation, for example people who go onto your profile and downvote literally every comment you make (it's already happened to me like 3 times) or those who use all of their alts to try and sway momentum on a comment their main makes. There's also times where there's no justification for a comment being upvoted; perfect example is when a nazi says "based" in response to an article about someone being racist and it gets like 20 upvotes. I don't think anyone reasonable would be against a banwave on something like that.

Obviously admins can see everything that goes through their servers for what should be obvious reasons, so this is more of a convenience thing. Moral of the story: don't join shitty crypto instances.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You would think adversarial actors would find this problematic in their own way. Does no one remember anymore way back when reddit was exposed as being an American state apparatus? Reddit owners its earlier more naive era used to share site metrics. They inadvertently revealed that large amounts of activity comes from a US military base. Then they wiped evidence and disavowed all knowledge that any of that ever happened. And now the narrative on there is that other state actors are the ones in control of that platform. How convenient.

White hat actors could be using such open access to data to reveal whats in the data. That's what the big social platforms are so scared of themselves. Not only is it their financial bread and butter. Contained within is who know how many skeletons piled up over the years.

Everyones privacy these days is basically long gone. There's illusion that internet platforms are in any way shape or form fair or balanced because of the paper thin concept of internet votes == democracy or something. Yet a lot of people stubbornly persist. It's past due time to shine a light on the adversarial actors run amok. Show us the anomalies in data that reveal how the typical real human user is powerless against adversarial actors.

I'd like to think it would be the last straw for the whole concept of social platforms at least the way that it is now. Who knows though. It's also shown us how dumb people are. They could very well just "meh" and go back to mindlessly infinite scrolling.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
98 points (81.4% liked)

Privacy

32482 readers
525 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS