223
submitted 11 months ago by BlanK0@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] palordrolap@kbin.social 41 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The jump from 7.x right to 24.x had me thinking this was an AI generated article at first, but the main LibreOffice website does indeed show that the new version number is 24.

EDIT: The article literally talks about this and I missed it. Twice. I would like to claim to be on drugs, but sadly(?) this is not the case.

The choice of 24 makes me think they've decided to switch to using the last two digits of the current year as the main version number, rather than the previous arbitrary increases, but I can't find anything obvious about this on the site.

Their current release schedule is every six months, and as long as they don't accelerate the way web browser releases do, this probably wouldn't come back to bite them.

The sub-version being .2 and it being February soon makes me wonder if that's intentional as well.

As for commentary on LibreOffice itself: I use it every once in a while, so I don't dig deep into its feature set(s) at all. In a previous update I noticed a few things had been moved around in Calc (the spreadsheet) which I'm still getting used to, but by and large all I can do is appreciate those working on it and, for whatever it's worth, thank them for their efforts.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So... you didn't read the article?

All of your speculation about versioning is correct. The subtitle of the article says:

This major release introduces a new calendar-based numbering scheme,

The second paragraph begins with:

Highlights of LibreOffice 24.2 include a new calendar-based numbering scheme (YY.M),

[-] palordrolap@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

Clearly I did not. And now I am concerned because I thought I did.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

Oh. That happens to me all the time. Like my wife will ask "did you take out the trash?" And I'll be all, "I thought I did." But clearly, I did not.

[-] palordrolap@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

To use the trash as an analogy, I even picked up the bag and walked around with it a bit (the tab was open. I know I looked at it and scrolled down), but did it make it to where it was supposed to go? (information can into brain?) Doesn't look like it.

[-] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

So where is the trash now? At the door? Or in a different room?

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

No one learned from Y2K 🤦‍♂️

[-] RandomStickman@kbin.social 28 points 11 months ago

In under 80 years they'll have to change the system again smh

[-] thejml@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Honestly, it’ll be 2100, so they could just keep incrementing… it won’t be two digits, but v100.2 would be fine and consistent. It’s y3k they need to watch out for.

Edit: though I guess then it’ll just be off… v1000.1 in 3000ad. Maybe we’ll just switch to stardate or something by then… or more likely be extinct.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

y2k38 will be even funnier than y2k and y3k I guess.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Just wait till y10k then the bug returns

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

Does anyone know how to make the UI look good under gnome?

[-] BlanK0@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

I have found this article that might be useful

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 2 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
223 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

48700 readers
1844 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS