98
submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] flicker@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Did you just make me, for half a second, support the serial gang rape of Senators who support this legislation?

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Rape babies can be dropped off at his front door.

[-] ClopClopMcFuckwad@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Rape Babies, the next great band name.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

We are seemingly moments away from women being prosecuted for giving men erections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Like.....what the fuck is going on right now?

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

We are reaping the rewards of "respecting religious beliefs".

I would absolutely abolish the goddamn psychos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sacredbirdman@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

He's making great arguments for one abortion that would've made the world a much better place.

[-] VioletRing@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

It seems more honest than touting exceptions as some sort of compromise. Have you ever thought of what a rape exception (or other exceptions) looks like in practice? They just don't happen. How many abortion providers are willing to test the law? How many pregnant people are able to get a police report necessary to be exempted? How many abortion providers are even practicing in states with rape exceptions to their otherwise strict abortion laws?

Arguing about what exceptions should or should not be on the books is a distraction. It's only service is to placate the general public into accepting barbaric abortion bans.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/01/21/us/abortion-ban-exceptions.html

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's also the most logically consistent. I respect these shitstains infinitely more then Republican politicians who support exceptions.

Respect is doing a lot of work there, but really it comes to down to fact that at least they ACTUALLY believe abortion is murder.

All those other GOP politicians who support exceptions are just groveling maggots.

What? You believe it's okay to murder babies in certain circumstances? Get fucked.

If you're going to destroy the lives of countless women, at least do it because you have an actual deeply held conviction, and not simply that you want to win a primary.

[-] snownyte@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

I can't even believe what I'm reading.

Maybe this asshole is an example of a forced birth, it's why he believes in it.

Buddy, I hope you are forcibly raped with the biggest dildo in existence and not lubed either.

[-] frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

He should really be forced to watch vaginal birth from 10 cm away

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

What is this garbage talk about God controlling whether a woman gets pregnant or not? It's a biological function, if the egg is there when the sperm is there, you get babies. It is not some holy blessed event -- God causing babies is about as sensible as the stork bringing them.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 0 points 8 months ago

It's all part of God's ineffable plan.

Just like all the rape, cancer, pain, and evil in the world.

All part of the plan.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Pra ba jeeba

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago
[-] Caaaaarrrrlll@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

Missouri really is misery.

[-] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I always knew something is wrong with a state when the local state drivers are policing the speed limit in the fast lane on the interstates.

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

This fucker deserves to be reincarnated as a women in medieval time and have a forced birth so he can experience what he puts women through

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago

Look, if our species was somehow struggling with birth rates and was on the verge of extinction, I might agree… but taking away someone’s bodily autonomy? No, that’s a step taken way too far over the line.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

This is EXACTLY what Republicans mean when they say they're HARD on Rapists! After a Rapist Rapes your daughter it's illegal for her to get an Abortion and if she does her Rapist gets a bunch of money from her!

[-] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

how ironic, if a man rapes a woman she's forced to have the baby and he goes to jail. but if a man rapes HIS woman (wife, daughter, sister), she'd forced to have the baby but he needs to die.

they don't care because this doesn't involve them.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Republicans should do a Jonestown to protect the children. Far more effective than whatever it is they are doing now.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
98 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3528 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS