Considering he said he would not be enforcing the abortion ban on IVF, this is almost certainly a far right terrorist.
I wouldn't trust it. He could easily change his mind, or the next AG could have differing opinions. You'll only be 'safe' after the statute of limitations ends, and the statute of limitations for murder is infinite.
Don't get me wrong, I don't trust him for shit. But considering his announcement was not long ago, this likely is not coming from anyone on the left.
Actually that's not true, there's a legal standard applied to public statements regarding enforcement from prosecutors and other related members of executive branches.
Ah yes, the legally binding pinky-promise.
Or a car backfired. Lol
Are there any oak trees in the area?
Apparently so, but they can't be mad at the attorney general for the acorns. He's anti-acorn as much as they are.
The attorney general that says they will not enforce the IVF thing?
Hmm, a clue.
Maybe for now.
Correct! Roe vs Wade was settled law for 50years and oops it's not.
Y'all got no one but yourselves to investigate. May I suggest you start with the names of the people who have directly said they would be doing this in direct communication with your office? Odds are hilariously high that they've filmed themselves doing it and posted it to the facepals.
Truth social. That's where the scum get their orders from Russia and Trump.
MAGAts, innit.
I'm not a fan of stochastic terrorism, but feel that finally one was directed towards something useful.
Edit: NM, seems it was a right-winger angry that the AG won't enforce the IVF ban.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.