121
submitted 10 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 46 points 10 months ago

The efficiency of capitalism. Spend god-knows-how-many millions of dollars and time, then realize you'd rather spend 125 million all over again just to go back and spend even more millions to hire back the dame numbers again in 1-3 years.

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They make 5 billion a year, thats less than 2.5% of the money they make every year, it's a rounding error to make the spreadsheets look real good to the money lenders .

My company just let me go with a 6 figure package (x amount of pay + stocks). They could have easily kept me there for another year, but that's not as good for the spreadsheets.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

I understand that, but still, the decision is a net negative. They are merely acting based on short-sighted insights.

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah that was kinda my point. All that matters is what the spreadsheet looks like now. It would have probably been a net positive to keep me given they are only going to grow and spend a fortune on hiring and new stocks. That's a different spreadsheet though, I also live in a country where it's expensive to fire full time employees collectively, so it's not like they are paying these kinds of sums for everyone. It's pretty cheap to make things look good on paper.

[-] rasakaf679@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, their whole goal is to look good on papers and stock market. Not to grow as actual company. They would rather cripple themselves than to strengthen themselves by slow growth...

[-] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

Short term gains are king for stock value.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

"These charges consist of approximately $50 million to $65 million associated with office space reductions, approximately $40 million to $55 million related to employee severance and employee-related costs, and $35 million to $45 million in costs associated with licensor commitments," reads the filing.

The severance I get, but why is closing offices costing them so much. And what are “ licensor commitments?”

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 30 points 10 months ago

cause commercial rental is a commitment, if you can't find another company to take over your lease, chances are you have to pay the majority of left over amount + penalty + restoration. Licensor commitments are similar but probably on tech/software licensing, ie. server rentals, Maya/Speedtree licensing agreement for the site, whatever cloud service they use for backup and share stuff, etc. Those at bigger scale aren't paid year to year like your regular indie studio just subscribe to Adobe/Autodesk for app uses per seat.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

Probably all the hardware and shit they have at those offices, too. Likely all leased.

[-] peter@feddit.uk 14 points 10 months ago

Maybe getting out of fixed leases?

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that would make sense. Commercial leases can be up to a decade long.

[-] stevecrox@kbin.run 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Every big UK company I have worked for doesn't own its building. They will typically agree to rent a building for 5-20 years at a fixed rate (longer times if its being purpose built for them) .

So I would expect this is paying out the rest of the rental agreements for a building to escape the building lease.

It is to do with financial reporting and the way asset and operational costs are reported.

[-] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Welp, I already didn't like the games EA currently makes. Looking forward to going well out of my way to avoid buying anything they put out, no matter how good the reviews, trailers, etc. seem.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Perfect example of "it's not about the money, it's about control"

[-] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Please don't be Bioware, please don't be Bioware...

[-] LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

It's already dead. Just let it go

[-] banichan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
121 points (97.6% liked)

Gaming

20189 readers
35 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS