674
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

YouTube Music team laid off by Google while workers testified to Austin City Council about working conditions::Some workers learned of the YouTube Music layoffs while testifying to the Austin city council about Google's refusal to negotiate with the union.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 123 points 9 months ago

YouTube music being built by Cognizant makes sense tbh.

[-] BorisBoreUs@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

... Realest comment so far

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Hmm I wonder if they're responsible for the Audible app, too?

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It all makes sense now.

[-] SuperIce@lemmy.world 83 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Cognizant, a professional services company that Alphabet contracted the YouTube Music team through, said in a statement that the workers were let go after their contract ended at its intended date, according to KXAN in Austin.

A spokesperson for Google told Business Insider that Cognizant is responsible for ending the workers' employment, not Google.

"Contracts with our suppliers across the company routinely end on their natural expiry date, which was agreed to with Cognizant," the company said in a statement.

Not sure how much of the fault is from Google's side here since the employees contracted from another company.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 109 points 9 months ago

I am not defending Google here, but Cognizant is trash. I run a firm of specialist and a bulk of our work is cleaning up after outfits like Cognizant , Infosys, etc.

All that said, firing a group of 43 workers that chose to unionize during an Austin City Council meeting as it was being live streamed is all sorts of spicy. Google and Cognizant fucked up.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

How's that work, is there lots of hair pulling? Or are you able to charge an arm and a leg and set your timelines because the clients don't have much of a choice?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

It's no surprise, after all Cognizant is the first letter in CHWTIA. 🤭

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Contractors at Google and other tech companies are typically treated and managed as real employees except for minor legal-motivated things like travel which is treated differently.

Further, contracts are typically for a fixed period of time.

That these employees/contractors seemed genuinely surprised by the abrupt termination suggests this was not the natural end of their contract. Google, not Cognizant, decides when their contracts end. If their contracts were terminated with no warning or reason given, it was initiated by Google. And with that background it seems pretty likely it was in retaliation to the union activity.

"But they're not Google employees", right? But then, that's why Google and other tech companies use contractors - to avoid giving those employees actual employee protections.

[-] net00@lemm.ee 35 points 9 months ago

If the team is finding out that their job ends on the same day, it's totally Google's doing, and not the vendor company.

Google loves cheap, disposable workers, that why half of their workers are contractors.

[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

I mean, if you're a contractor and they haven't discussed extending more than a month ahead of time, expect your contract to end on its end date. That's just common sense.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 months ago

You assume the cognizant employees are privy to the contract terms.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

That could be the case, in any case it wouldn't be Google fault, but Cognizant.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I've worked at two employers who used the contractor loophole. At the first one, the length of the contract and extensions were never mentioned to me ever. The second one constantly played games with extension. At one point I was set to have my final week of employment, only for them to extend it over the weekend.

I've been in the contractor shoes for way longer than I should have (which is zero), So as a hardfast rule, "expect your contract to end on its end date" simply doesn't hold up. Corps like to play games with it, and leave employees out of the loop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

They did tell these employees to not worry about their contract ending, that it would be extended.

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

The National Labor Review Board ruled that Google was a co-employer of these union members and, thus, ruled that both Google and Cognizant had to come to the table to hammer out a bargaining agreement with them. Google refused. When this council resolution was put forth, Katherine McAden of Google Austin emailed the Austin City Council members on 02/28/24 to ask them to postpone the vote to "give Google, and the City Council, time to fully understand the direction of this item and potential local outcomes." The very next day (02/29/24), while two members were in the middle of testifying to the council, that was the exact moment Google fired the lot of them.

I don't see how much more open and shut you can get here.

[-] PigsInClover@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Thank you for this. This should be the top comment.

I wonder how the new Cemex framework affects this.

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 22 points 9 months ago

Lol corporate world is not for you my guy. They contract other companies specifically for this reason. Order cognizant to fire workers and when questioned , oooohh they were contractors. 🤷‍♀️

[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

At least in the UK, if you work like an employee enough, the court can overrule the technicality of your employment status as a contractor and apply labor law protections.

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

This is exactly what happened with these union members. The National Labor Review Board ruled that Google was a co-employer along with Cognizant, and they ruled that Google just come to the bargaining table with these union members. They refused. They emailed city council members asking for a postponement of their vote to give them time to sort stuff out, and it was granted. The very next day, the fired the entire union out of retaliation for speaking to the city council voicing their concerns.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 3 points 9 months ago

You have any idea the wide spread feelings on this?

It sounds like that's what we should be doing in more countries,.US.

[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Oh the US has tried to fix this issue multiple times. The end result was many of us getting laid off after 18 months every time because they couldn't extend our contacts any further by law. There's no reason for a company to convert a contractor if they're not required to.

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

that's because they keep going at it from a timeline POV; I believe if they made required work time slots as a limitation against contract work (i.e if you are required to work between x-y daily) this issue would be resolved. There's no real reason for many contract positions to be a static time slot, contractors are supposed to be fully flexible on their own time as long as the end product is correct and within SLA, thd only benefit to fixed scheduling is management level, so I think that would tip the scale onto employee instead of contractor

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redfox@infosec.pub 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it's frustrating when people in turn can't find good medical insurance.

The trade for sometimes higher pay or flexibility in assignments doesn't work when you can't afford insurance or other benefits.

Assuming you were even being paid about permanent positions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Virulent@reddthat.com 13 points 9 months ago

Contactor staffing companies exist solely to get around employment regulations. Demonic industry

[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Blaming another business? Hmmm. Sounds like Boeing's attempted solution.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 9 months ago

Having moved onto a team in my company with Cognizant contractors, I can kinda understand Google not renewing the contract. In my experience, half of the PRs needed to be redone because of poor quality.

[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Yep. Worked with them before. They coached their consultants to pass our tech interviews but had zero actual experience. One guy didn't know how to open a rails console... On a rails app job. Accenture is just as bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TCGM@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

That sounds all kinds of highly illegal and I cannot wait for the delicious lawsuit

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 18 points 9 months ago

It's Texas, don't hold your breath.

[-] knightmare1147@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I never see repurcussions for this in the US but maybe it's just not reported as much

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Well, well, well.... who would have thought that the company who said don't do evil did evil anyway. This is why I don't trust corporations because their only loyalty is to investors who just wants more money.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Genuinely, why is it so difficult to be a good company? There's that one company that paid all their workers like 70k and the employees would die for the company. Loyalty means something and reinvesting in your workers builds a stronger company, no? What's the deal? Everyone fights for pennies vs building a strong foundation in a company culture and living it.

[-] MeepsTheBard@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

The people making the big decisions aren't the ones working. They're the ones put in charge to make money for investors, who want monthly returns. Not "here's what will get us 1XX% growth in 6-8 years," but now.

And you'd think this would only be the case with public companies, but private equity is gobbling up quality companies and milking them dry by cutting costs and abusing their brand's good name. People want returns on their investments QUICK these days.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

In most cases the shareholders that own the company don’t care about the company’s purpose, just their ROI in a certain time frame. And then the executives incentives are structured to reward quick financial results.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Are you talking about Gravity Payments and its CEO, Dan Price? Sorry to break the fairy tale but it has been shown that he is some weird, creepy guy who ran his team like a cult and accused of sexual allegations. He resigned over a year ago. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/aug/18/dan-price-resigns-ceo-gravity-payments

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Honest answer. Infinite growth is the only business model we universally accept. This puts unrealistic expectations on how we define success.

It's not enough to own a successful diner making good cheap food for 500 people a day. Why can't you do that for 5000 people? 50,000 people? Then in comes efficiency and questions about profit. Meanwhile your Zadie who started the restaurant 60 years ago is long dead and so is the simple life he envisioned for his kids.

[-] Noble_Stacking_1337@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

If you want to listen to music on YouTube but don't like this type of fuckwadary, try out the Clear Skies chrome extension to skip ads and let them keep their advertisements to themselves.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago

oooooor just install uBlock Origin

[-] mom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 9 months ago

And switch to Firefox or at least ungoogled chromium

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

And ReVanced for Android! Grayjay and new pipe are good too

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The entire YouTube Music team is out of a job as tensions rise at Google parent company, Alphabet.

"We just got laid off, our jobs are ending today, effective immediately," one worker tells the city council in video of the meeting.

In a statement on X, formerly known as Twitter, the union said the YouTube Music team was based out of Austin, and was receiving such low pay that some members were working multiple jobs to make ends meet.

The YouTube Music team previously went on strike in February 2023 over Google's crackdown on remote work.

Pichai and Google are feeling the growing pressure of competition from new innovations in artificial intelligence, heightened by the company's recent failures with AI, BI previously reported.

Google recently put a hold on its AI image generator, Gemini, after it created historically inaccurate photos.


The original article contains 417 words, the summary contains 140 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
674 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

60073 readers
3539 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS