422
submitted 9 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 228 points 9 months ago

There was a discussion a couple of years ago around gasoline taxes and how they are supposed to pay for roadway maintenance. The question came up about EVs. There were discussions about how to include EVs in the taxation system so they would pay for their fair share of the road. One of the options was to impose a tax attached to your vehicle registration based upon the weight of the vehicle. The greater the weight, the more wear and tear it produces on the road surface. This might be one solution to the barrier problem, namely moving the extra cost to the reason for the extra cost.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 126 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The "problem" with that tax is that if it's applied fairly, it gets very big very fast. The damage to the road goes up with weight, but not linearly. Not a square factor, either. Not even cube. It's to the fourth power.

Start applying that to long haul trucks and the whole industry will be bankrupt in a month. The implication being that we are all subsidizing that industry with taxes on roads. Including that one trucker with a "who is John Galt?" sticker on the back.

That said, this is also a very good argument for improving cargo trains to the point where most long haul trucking goes away.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 75 points 9 months ago

And frankly, I'm really ok with this.

Trains should be the backbone for shipping. They are WAY more fuel efficient, like 3 to 4x more efficient than shipping by truck. Rail requires far less maintenance. And there's always the option install a 3rd rail and use electricity instead of fossil fuels to ship.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Speaking of road tax, you know that bad-faith argument about how cyclists need to pay our "fair share?" Well, I would be happy to pay 1¢ for my 10 kg bicycle if everybody with a car had to pay fairly by weight^4^.

[-] RidgeDweller@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago

Maybe it's because I don't really know anyone passionate on either side of this issue, but I've never heard of this argument. I know you said it's a bad faith argument, but I can't really imagine what a cyclist's fair share would be aside from maybe widening a road to add a bike lane lol

[-] Nurgle@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

You see it a lot on in the comment sections of local newspapers or the city specific subs on Reddit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goronmon@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

No reason the tax had to scale exactly to match the damage though. At least make it painful enough so people consider whether a larger vehicle is worth it.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 9 months ago

What I'm suggesting is to ramp up the tax on roads over several years in order to pay for the initial outlay on new train infrastructure. Then you don't need 90% of the trucking industry at all.

Which would be great for many other reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] magiccupcake@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

So much of that freight should be moved by rail.

Tax based on weight to 4th power would work if we nationalized railways like roads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I think turning highways back into methods of travel instead of "rolling warehouses saving Walmart a few bucks not storing anything on site" is a good thing.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago

There was a discussion a couple of years ago around gasoline taxes and how they are supposed to pay for roadway maintenance.

I just want to point out, even if they're supposed to, gas taxes do not pay for roadway maintenance, not by a long shot

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 157 points 9 months ago

Yeah well let's quit making 7000 pound consumer vehicles. Small EVs would be more efficient and better for the environment because they need less materials to build and and less energy to recharge.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Judging by the general trend I don't think this is happening anytime soon. The overall car industry is obsessed with even bigger cars.

And even in Europe it is sickening to see those half buses on our roads. And this is especially true for big cities, where parking space is very limited and usually those cars occupy park space for 1.5-2 cars.

And knowing that the fertility rate is really going down I wonder what justifies those cars.

[-] kronarbob@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

There was once a legend about vehicle's size and ... Well...

5654842_700b-2152166632

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] realitista@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

That's because the USA subsidizes bigger trucks as "work vehicles". This practice needs to stop and they need to be taxed more than smaller vehicles.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Yeah because emission standards are based on size and weight. So why spend the money making environmentally effective equipment when you can just make everything bigger and still rake in money?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

Congratulations, the fossil fuel industry just put a hit on you

[-] labsin@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

Small PHEV's would be ideal for the current generation. Battery advances will come, but we should always try to optimize with the current technology and 10 cars with a 10th the battery of a Tesla would be better for the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 113 points 9 months ago

Tldr most guard rails are designed to stop vehicles under 5000lbs. Passenger vehicles are starting to exceed that, and EVs can weight 30% more than ICE vehicles.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 92 points 9 months ago

That's 3175 kg for non-free folk. My car has around 1600 kg. 7k pound car is a fat fat cow.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] 342345@feddit.de 83 points 9 months ago

Just get an even bigger car, it will keep you safe from those.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 22 points 9 months ago

I mean... kind of?

10 or 20 years ago? I would never have driven an SUV and thought anyone in one is stupid.

Five or six years ago? I needed a new car and ended up getting a "crossover" (so basically a hatchback on a lift kit). Still tiny compared to a lot of the cars on the road but a lot bigger than what I ever expected to drive.

Because in a sedan (like my rental a few months back)? My head is literally at bumper level for a LOT of the vehicles on the road. And now we have shit like the cybertruck where the bumper is a jagged metal wedge. I have a lot of faith in modern safety specs but that is still terrifying. In my small suv? I am still grill height for a lot of trucks but at least I am not weaving around monster trucks in a clown car.

Don't get me wrong. I very much enjoy the increased ground clearance and ability to haul an entire car worth of camping gear comfortably. But I also know that I am "never" going to go smaller. And... that is kind of the problem. People are dragged kicking and screaming because the alternative is to feel like you are going to die the next time someone decides they are going to ignore a red light.

[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

That it's a arms race doesn't make it better for society as a whole. It sucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] techt@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

I didn't realize until now, but I've been very fortunate to be able to take the bus to work recently, and the lack of fear of other vehicles on the road is probably a huge contributor to how much better I feel after the commute. I have that anxiety ever-present in the back of my mind while driving a sedan.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TengoHipo@lemm.ee 43 points 9 months ago

We just need to not have these big ass trucks for the general public. You don’t need a ford 350 with rims jacked up to show you have money. You are a pavement princess.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

"But I need it for my work!"

You don't even have a toolbox on it. If it was an actual work truck, it would be a pickup with the bed replaced with one of those toolbox beds. Or you'd have a sprinter van like the actual plumbers and carpenters around here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Neon@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

7000 Pounds is 3.2 Tons (metric)

3.2 Tons

geez, i wonder why these guardrails wouldn't work on a fucking Truck

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

This becomes a self-reinforcing cycle. If there are 7000lb passenger trucks on the highway around my compact car, I maybe start wanting to get a larger vehicle myself to protect myself from the idiots who drive them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 35 points 9 months ago

My first car had a curb weight of 2400 lbs. It's absurd how fucking huge these planet-destroying, environment destroying, life destroying monstrosities have become.

[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 34 points 9 months ago

Simple, if you buy a car that's too heavy for the existing infrastructure, you either pay for the improved infrastructure or take the risk yourself. The minivan that I drive the kids in is only 4,300 lb. If you're driving something heavier than that then, best of luck. I expect that if I'm driving a camper, and I fall off the road, I'm just done. Game over.

I don't expect infrastructure to adapt to the minority. That's not what it's for.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] warm@kbin.earth 29 points 9 months ago
[-] cogman@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

The only solution is a bigger truck.

We need to get rid of the commie laws requiring special licensing (CDL, Communist driver's license) for freedom trucks.

[-] Encinos@dormi.zone 24 points 9 months ago

"The goliath-like GMC Hummer EV weighs a staggering 9,083 pounds, 2 tons more than a gas-guzzling H3."

I’m confused 'Murica, do you want freedom or not?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
422 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS