339
submitted 9 months ago by catculation@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 130 points 9 months ago

On February 10th, a federal judge ordered Musk to cooperate in the SEC’s investigation, asserting that if a date and location for the interview couldn’t be agreed upon between the parties within a week then the decision would be made for them. That testimony has yet to take place

So tired of all these assholes never seeing any consequences for simple shit normal people would never get away with.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 26 points 9 months ago

I’d love it if courts had the power to seriously enforce shit like this. Fail to meet a deadline that’s been agreed upon by all parties? Okay, then officers will arrest you and put you in jail until you do.

That’s just my immediate, angry reaction, though. It doesn’t solve the core problem, which is that rich people are above the law.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago

It was my understand that's exactly what they could do, and do. But yeah, rich people don't apply.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Show up for this legal proceeding

Lol suck my cock.

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 54 points 9 months ago

Can we revoke his government contracts now?

[-] Beefytootz@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

How bout we go straight to deporting this fraud

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

And nationalize his businesses

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

They essentially already are.

Tesla likely would not be selling cars if the government didn’t offer EV tax incentives.

SpaceX’s largest customer is the U.S Government.

Musk has torpedoed every other company he’s touched.

If the only reason you are in business is to sell things that the government is helping pay for, why are you even a business. He’s blown through his budget that NASA gave him for Starship and still doesn’t have a working product.

The Cybertruck Founders Edition doesn’t have the Self Driving feature that made it 20k more expensive, and has a real chance of being a fraud trial.

Why are we giving private companies boatloads of tax dollars to develop vaporware?

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Nonononono. So long as those profits are going to private pockets, they are FAR from nationalized.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

We only nationalize the losses.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Nah, SpaceX does good work for NASA. Instead nationalize Musk’s shares.

[-] Traister101@lemmy.today 0 points 9 months ago

Like? So far they've just wasted billions of dollars and "rapidly disassembled" rockets using tax payer dollars

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I know that development costs are mind boggling in scale, we’re looking at around $5B dollars so far on Starship, (and the government only paid for part of that).

But let’s put that into perspective, it was around $11B NASA spent on developing SLS, and SLS costs $2B per launch. So we’re still within comparable costs for development of a heavy lift vehicle.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

Meanwhile, if I were to skip court for a jaywalking ticket, they'd put a warrant out for my arrest.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Not if you put a team of lawyers on it. That's the key difference here.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Can the judge not hold him in contempt?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

He could, but Musk has "rich politically connected white guy immunity".

Times infinitely for being a hectobillionaire AND far right. He could murder a man on the white house lawn and Secret Service wouldn't arrest him.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You might be right, but they might not immediately recognize him. Depending on things… he could be dead before they do.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

How many federalist society shit heels are there lurking in the judiciary trying to force vigilantism to occur instead of doing their fucking jobs

[-] suction@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago
[-] misanthropy@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
339 points (97.0% liked)

News

23684 readers
3356 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS