212
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Donald Trump's problematic $175 million bond to cover his New York civil fraud appeal has raised questions about what exactly led to the rejection of his insurer's paperwork, says a legal analyst.

The Trump Organization's court-appointed monitor, Barbara Jones, likely has all the answers, MSNBC legal analyst, Lisa Rubin, wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

. . .

"The financial statement that is missing does not seem to be Trump's. Rather, the court appears to be demanding these documents from Knight Specialty Insurance Co. to ensure that the company is sufficiently capitalized and authorized to post the bond," Rubin wrote on Wednesday.

"Meanwhile, we still don't know what fee Trump paid for the bond or exactly what collateral he pledged," Rubin added.

"But you know who likely DOES have all of those details? Retired federal judge Barbara Jones, the court-appointed monitor in the case. Under a 3/21/24 order, the Trump Org must give her advanced notice of their efforts to secure surety bonds."

MBFC
Archive

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 109 points 8 months ago

The court would likely reject Trump's bond if the paperwork is not corrected. That would mean Trump would lose his right to appeal Engoron's fraud judgment and the $454 million would be due.

Based on everything that lead up to this they will just lower the amount and give him even more time to find someone else, because rulings and laws just don't appear to mean anything.

[-] WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago

The government is scared of Trump supporters and it shows.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 44 points 8 months ago

Also the courts treating an ex president with kids gloves because god forbid they be treated like a regular person.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

They worry he will win in November. Really we need to make sure he loses and then they can throw his ass in prison.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

They need to hold him accountable now or lose their job or worse. That's not fair to the rest of us for them to shrug off their duties like that.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately we don't live in a world were the rich can be held accountable. Hell 90% of Congress are millionaires. They system is set up for the 1%. We are oligarchy not a democracy. Trump getting away with his crimes in plain sight is proof of that.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

There is no reason to wait.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Yeah I'm actually surprised the government is so weak against them. Kind of makes me not respect the laws much anymore lol

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 36 points 8 months ago

TBH, I would be surprised if Jones has those answers. Trump is SUPPOSED to be keeping Jones appraised of such happenings, but since when has he cared for protocol, and when has he ever been held accountable?

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] gearheart@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You hear that everyone. If you ever get a bond for a crime just purposely fill out wrong to reduce your sentence. 😁 #shittylifeprotips

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

"Meanwhile, we still don't know what fee Trump paid for the bond or exactly what collateral he pledged," Rubin added.

Oh. You know.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
212 points (98.2% liked)

News

23655 readers
4455 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS