520
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gigan@lemmy.world 161 points 8 months ago

They found a way to outsource grocery store employees. great

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 67 points 8 months ago

Yeah this has been my biggest takeaway actually from this story circulating.

The rich and business owners have now found a way to export even basic service jobs to cheaper countries to mostly save themselves the money and reap the profits.

I'm a pretty far leftist but holy moly we really need to stop selling every job to cheap laborers because it's only enriching those who already have enough and seems to do little good for anyone else.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 27 points 8 months ago

I dont think "not wanting to outsource to the cheapest labour pool" is a hallmark of the left or the right wing.
I think "not wanting to outsource" is both progressive and anti-capitalist.

Doing things as cheap as possible, no matter who suffers, is absolutely a capitalist thing, and is why government regulation and government oversight is so important... As long as the government isnt in on it, of course (thats just a corrupt government)

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I dont think "not wanting to outsource to the cheapest labour pool" is a hallmark of the left or the right wing.

Exactly. At least here in the US, both ruling parties are 100% capitalist and exist to enrich the wealthy to an even more obscene degree than they already do.

It's why when they ask for political donations I put that money in stocks instead.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

That's not the point at all. They wanted to automate this with computers and it failed. They had to rely on workers in India to do the analysis. That's why they're canceling this service.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

But AI is intelligent and sentient, just throw more server farms at the problem, right?

/s

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I know you're trying to be funny, but while AI does have many uses, I imagine the issue for Amazon was that much like self driving there were just too many edge cases to try to solve here.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

If we are in an era of economic wars, can we get laws to charge companies with treason?

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 66 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Jesus christ these headlines mislead everything.

They were using machine learning to try and figure out what people were buying. Machine learning has lots of errors until you train it. The "hundreds of workers" were training it by telling it what each thing was. E.g. it was creating training data for it to learn from.

The goal was to train ML enough so that humans were rarely necessary, obviously.

[-] baru@lemmy.world 64 points 8 months ago

Jesus christ these headlines mislead everything.

One article included how often employees needed to look at the cameras. That was the case in something like 80% of the times people went in to shop.

The goal was to train ML enough so that humans were rarely necessary, obviously.

The headline is pretty accurate. That might have been the goal, but they didn't come close. And now they are closing down those stores.

Seems that they utterly failed in the goal.

Machine learning has lots of errors until you train it.

These stores were open for a pretty long time. It's not a given that it's just a matter of training.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 26 points 8 months ago

Except they still had thousands if employees in India watching the surveillance tapes to see what people bought and charged them for it

Amazon can claim this was a stop gap all they want, but the truth is that the technology behind the core concept isn't there and they just pretended it worked so the project head wouldn't have to explain why they are behind schedule and over budget. It's the same as with their drone delivery service 10 years ago. All smoke and mirrors to make moron tech bros cream themselves

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

You need training data though I don't understand what the problem is. Hell it doesn't even matter if they never actually make the technology work that'll be their problem. They can't lie and tell people it works if it doesn't but as far as I'm aware they're not actually doing that.

I don't like amazing very much but they do enough crappy things for you to actually get upset about so it just seems odd that you would pick this hill to die on.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 9 points 8 months ago

They gave up collecting that data though, that's why they are shutting down the department. All they managed to do was outsource grocery store cashiers to India, which seems like an exceptional shitty thing to me

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

My goal is to build a fusion reactor.

I will hire Indian call center workers to add fuel to my diesel generator until the fusion is up and running.

This plan makes sense to certain people on the internet.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

You could probably get lots of funding with this. I say go for it.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 22 points 8 months ago

The goal was to train ML enough so that humans were rarely necessary, obviously.

Yes, that's the goal.

There's a long rich history of AI like outcomes being mimiced by just hiding the human who does the work. That's actually the source of the name of Amazon's own "Mechanical Turk" service.

Not being actively watched by an army of underpaid workers is effectively still on the "someday...maybe" feature list for this thing, unless Amazon (famous for making delivery workers pee in soda bottles, and allowing warehouse workers to get heat stroke) somehow provides credible proof that they've actually grown past that.

I, as someone with substantial professional ML experience, won't take Amazon at their word, when they claim the ML has alleviated the need for the army of workers watching cameras. That's bullshit marketing promise, until proven otherwise. Particularly coming from Amazon.

Moving away from the people watching to using pure AI is well within the realm of possibility.

But good AI maintainers cost more per hour to pay than the entire army of mechanical turk "trainers". So I am skeptical of any claim that Amazon, in particular, has done the right thing here.

So it's very fair to assume you're being watched in one of those stores, until real credible evidence is provided that you're not.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

They were using machine learning to try and figure out what people were buying. Machine learning has lots of errors ~~until you train it.~~

Machine Learning, no matter how well trained or advanced, is just doing a make-em-up.

Besides that, in this case the experiment has been going on for years and humans were still doing like 70% of the work. It was a failure, that's why Amazon shut it down

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

That's their excuse but it is convenient for them that in order to train the AI the workers need to follow the exact same steps as what an AI would be doing if it was sufficiently trained. We can't say as outsiders to what extent the actual work is assisted by AI. Seems likely that it is largely a manual process.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

I understand the spirit, but that's how it goes. You have somebody doing the work, as you want the ML to do it, and then feed the data. It's the same when they get oncology scans that have been diagnosed by well paid doctors, somebody who knows does and the machine tries to replicate.

What very likely happened is that the failure rate platoed much higher than they expected, and all this time the goal was to lower it. Remember, it's cheaper to have 0 people in India than 1, specially with AWS in mind.

Moreover, even if the accuracy was incredibly high, they would still need people reviewing. You have to review random events to ensure the model keeps performing well and to evaluate the ones with low confidence or suspicious.

[-] Granixo@feddit.cl 63 points 8 months ago
[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago

Yeah it was always suspect when this "shopping experience" came from the company behind Mechanical Turk.

[-] BobDolesBBallHandle@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Was about to make the same comment ๐Ÿ˜‰. Will share the wiki instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_Turk?wprov=sfti1#

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago
[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I'm not exactly sure how they would have set this up given that their usual solution of Mechanical Turk does not pay their workers in cash anywhere outside of the US.

In some rural parts of the states Mechanical Turk is the largest employer but workers in other countries can only get paid in Amazon vouchers.

Somehow there are still a lot of Indian people working for Mechanical Turk though. It's not clear if they are exchanging the vouchers or are stuck in a hellish walled garden where their wages can only be spent with their employer.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 8 months ago

a hellish walled garden where their wages can only be spent with their employer.

There are also a bunch of reports of businesses in India where people with loan debts being forced to work in hellish conditions and not allowed to leave by armed guards, basically indentured servitude/slave labor.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Isn't that like, company scrip. I thought that was meant to be illegal.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

It is, but Uncle Sam can't do anything about how you "pay" your "workforce" in other countries.

I mean, they actually can, but then corporate lobbying groups will be sad, so Congress wont do anything about it.

[-] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

What ever happened to doing this with UHF RFID? Getting the cost of the individual chips down was always just a matter of scaling production.

[-] londos@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

They weren't just tracking what you bought. They wanted to track what you looked at and for how long, to learn what packaging worked best.

[-] bangupjobasusual@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago

Iโ€™m pretty sure the first chess program was just a grand master playing remotely

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Yes, that's where amazon got the name of their service from

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 2 points 8 months ago

Well, that one was not so much remote and more like hidden in the silly fake automaton thing.

[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

"Hey Vitesh, this John guy just stole two chickens"

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 10 points 8 months ago

Hey! Guess how they remove all of the content they DON'T want to train AI's on?

A disturbing portion of the internet's scams are held up by schemes like this.

[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 8 points 8 months ago

Big fuckin shocker

You mean to tell me big businesses are exploiting low wage countries?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The company touted the technology, which allowed customers to bypass traditional checkouts, as an achievement powered entirely by computer vision.

An Amazon spokesperson disputed that claim in a statement to Business Insider, saying that the team in India mostly helps train the model that the company used for Just Walk Out.

"Associates may also validate a small minority of shopping visits where our computer vision technology cannot determine with complete confidence an individual's purchases," the spokesperson said.

While customers used Just Walk Out at Amazon Fresh stores, "they also wanted the ability to easily find nearby products and deals, view their receipt as they shop, and know how much money they saved while shopping throughout the store" โ€” all options that the company's Dash Cart provides, the company spokesperson said of the change.

The technology allowed customers to enter a store by identifying themselves with their Amazon account.

Startups have also created their own versions of Just Walk Out and tested them at retailers including Aldi and Dollar General.


The original article contains 432 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

Wait, how does this technology work!?

(other than being really bad at what it does... )

[-] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The type of shit you'd see on a movie

[-] Techranger@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

It would be fun to have a Bollywood style flashmob show up at one of these stores.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

All "AI" relies on thousands and thousands of low-paid, overworked humans in the Global South staring at screens so snake-oil salesmen in SV and Redmond can claim they're about to revolutionize the world. It's all lies.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Actually most AI relies on high quality data acquired from all sorts of sources including academic research papers, GitHub code repositories, books and journals, newspapers, and technical manuals.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 8 months ago

Uh-huh... And yet reddits biggest source of cash recently was selling the comments section for training AI data... Sure. "High Quality"

Only if you recognize most the comments are written by people who are high.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago

Reddit is run by an idiot. Don't worry about what reddit's doing they're not making money.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Manually parsed and corrected by near-slave labor.

Enjoy your funny ChatGPT output though, you monster.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What the actual hell is that comment? I'm sorry are you suggesting some kind of evil cabal or something?

Might want to make some more sense

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago

All โ€œAIโ€

Not even close to true.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

If you unhinge your jaw a little further I'm sure you can fit that VC cock further back in your throat.

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago

I think you are confused about what "AI" means. You are referring to a very small subset if AI.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's got nothing to do with how wide my mouth is open.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
520 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
2892 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS