840
submitted 8 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 157 points 8 months ago

Absolutely ridiculous that it took this long for them to tell us what they are selling.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 73 points 8 months ago

GIGA huge MASSIVE!!!!!! (30MBPS)

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

And the tiny text that reads "*30mpbs downlink speed, 5mpbs uplink speed. Studies from the 90s have shown morons like you don't need useful upload speeds lmao"

[-] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Studies from the 90s have shown morons like you don’t need useful upload speeds lmao”

More like "we want you to consoom product and only consoom product. If you want to produce something and host it, we will charge you out the ass for it 'cause obviously that's only a thing profit-seeking businesses do. Wait, you say you want to host your personal passion project as a hobby -- what are you, some sort of motherfucking commie scum??"

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago

I'm already a bit mad about 50mbps up on a gigabit down line

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Up to. Actual speeds may vary by time of day, over subscription, lobbying, and the your local consumer protection regulations.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Blazing fast (compared to throwing your computer into mud pit)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 63 points 8 months ago

Data caps in 2024.. first world country.. allegedly.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

first world country

That just means NATO, not high on the human development index.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

That is the original meaning. The colloquial meaning is different. Language is fluid.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Actually, the US was downgraded to “developing nation” for lack of nationwide accessible healthcare in 2017.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago

“Today’s nationwide launch of the Broadband Consumer Labels means internet service providers are now required to display consumer-friendly labels at the point of sale,” the Federal Communications Commission said. “Labels are required for all standalone home or fixed Internet service or mobile broadband plans. Providers must display the label—not simply an icon or link to the label—in close proximity to an associated plan’s advertisement.”

The labels are required now for providers with at least 100,000 subscribers, while ISPs with fewer customers have until October 10, 2024, to comply. “If a provider is not displaying their labels or has posted inaccurate information about its fees or service plans, consumers can file a complaint with the FCC Consumer Complaint Center,” an agency webpage says.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Because of course the FCC has a CCC

the FCCCCC, even.

Helpful quote though, thanks.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

The democrats just got majority of the FCC in October. They passed this, and are almost ready to reenact Net Neutrality, despite Carr’s stalling tactics.

[-] triped@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago

I mean this is nice and all but for it to matter I would need to have options available.

[-] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 24 points 8 months ago

My power company installed fiber on the power lines and started their own ISP. So my co-op is my ISP. Kinda nice

You should call yours and find out if they have any plans for it.

[-] Trollception@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Yea same here. I actually moved to a new area of the country in part to have access to quality municipal fiber.

[-] benignintervention@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Comcast raised my rate my 30% a few weeks ago and I went on a rage filled search for a replacement. The only other providers are either barely usable or starlink.

load more comments (3 replies)

I was in a neighborhood where we had FOUR competitors, all giving reasonable pricing. I immediately went to customer service and told them I'm switching, and they magically found a way to keep me happy.

I am now in a neighborhood with only Comcast cable and Verizon DSL. The pricing is $40 vs $120 for basic speed. The competition when there's only two carriers is a lie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 42 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is some bullshit if this is in compliance. I had to enter my address for the quote, still doesn't show what the fucking taxes are, or real price.

Edit: Not in compliance "The labels must include any additional monthly charges, one-time fees, early termination fees, and taxes." filed fcc complaint. Fuck Comcast.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 17 points 8 months ago

“Comcast and other ISPs complained that listing every monthly fee would be too difficult”

This is very hard to reach compliance, but you’re not smart enough to understand why.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

sometimes asking a computer to add and multiply numbers is just too hard

[-] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 months ago

They can sure figure it out to bill me. But monitoring my data usage was too hard, so I switched providers. Lucky me, I have exactly one other to choose from, but at least they don't have caps.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I'm guessing they have until the end of the day to be in compliance and they will wait until the very last second.

[-] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 18 points 8 months ago

Ars article was posted on the 10th. This was taken on the 11th.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Well then never mind that, I guess they're just breaking the law.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Do you really think a gigantic corporation like them would do that‽ just go about and ignore the law in the name of profit?

[-] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

If their only punishment is a meager fine, then yes it happens all the time. At that point it's simply the cost of doing business.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 37 points 8 months ago

So we get to clearly see how shitty our only ISP option is.

[-] Winged_Hussar@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Lol, all of Spectrum's plans (outside gig) say "Typical Upload: 10Mbs or higher"

Why is it so hard for ISPs to provide a higher upload speed

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Sonic internet provides 10Gb up and down. I have no idea how they do it, but I love them.

[-] icedterminal@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Balancing, customer needs, limitation of hardware/infrastructure. Copper doesn't handle symmetrical download and upload as well (this is where fiber comes in). There can be too much noise resulting in degraded consistency. Its prone to interference and leaks. To improve reliability, you get asymmetrical plans. Most people just want download. Which has historically been the cheaper choice. An example local to my area, a home plan will be 800 down and 20 up. A business plan will be 500 down and 300 up. The business plan costs more.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, but nowadays with self hosting, cloud synced apps, peer to peer game matchmaking, and working from home... Cable is practically useless, yet still the only option in some places.

I switched to 5G. Get the same download and was more upload for less money. Latency is a little lame sometimes. It's not terrific for online gaming. But it's better for everything else.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] aPirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago

Yeah I get 370 mbps down but only 10 mbps up why can't I at least have around 50 up? Is it really that hard or just capitalism? lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] uis@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What country? Anyway, good, good.

EDIT: ah, USA. Fix your ISPs already.

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

well this is a step towards that

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 8 months ago

Saying things like "up to 25 Mbps" is well and good, but it doesn't fix the problem that ISPs don't invest in ensuring the availability of sufficient network bandwidth for speeds to actually be what is promised, and doesn't fix the problem that the definition of bandwidth should be well beyond 25 Mbps by this point, with a minimum upload speed of far beyond the laughable 3 Mbps minimum.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Yeah, definitions need to be updated to reflect modern standards. As it is currently, “broadband” is a very outdated term, with 100/20 DSL still included under the broadband umbrella. But many people would agree that 100Mbps DSL is far too slow to count as modern broadband, and companies shouldn’t be able to market it as such.

There are also big issues with companies marketing “fiber” service, but it’s really just a fiber trunk line to the neighborhood, with copper for the last quarter mile to each individual home. It means customers don’t get a true fiber experience, (like symmetrical up/down speeds) because they’re still bottlenecked by the copper run. It also means they still have issues with things like massive throttling during peak hours, because the aging copper infrastructure can’t support modern needs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

You mean they didn't have to tell you price and speed already? Ffs! 🤦

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

They had to give you a price and a speed, but often that price gets jacked way up with hidden fees, and the speeds they provide are usually just speeds you could get during off peak hours.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Google has its issues as a company, but I’m pretty happy with symmetrical gigabit for $70.70 a month. I’m pretty sure 2 gigabit, and possibly 5, are also available at my location, but I’d have to upgrade all my network stuff to use that.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Now all we have to do is get ISPs to define what they consider a data cap.

Every single ISP has unlimited Internet as long as you don't exceed a certain amount of data and then you get 56k speeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] geography082@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago
[-] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago

Wait, wasn't always like this? Also data caps? Is this talking about mobile or wifi internet?

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

Yeah, but now if they provide inaccurate info, you can report them for it. Also, they have to provide it in an easy to understand format.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
840 points (99.5% liked)

News

23684 readers
3966 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS