113
submitted 8 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 12 points 8 months ago

Nice, as someone who has done some product research for specialized smartwatches, these specs are pretty much the go-to standard for generic chinese mid-range smartwatches.

Definitely a great base for an open source smart watch. You can do a lot with that!

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Nice but it feels like a rather thick stack for a watch.

[-] user@lemmy.one 9 points 8 months ago

Ok everybody go buy, so I can request a rectangular face lol.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Two things In need in a smartwatch: long battery life (at least 5 days), and copious music storage space. I mean, I also need a clock, sleep and heartrate sensors, step monitoring, etc, but they're stuff most normal smartwatches have already.

I'm currently using a Hauwei GT2 which I don't connect to the internet except when unavoidable, such as when transferring music from my phone to the watch, but I would gladly prefer an open source solution.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

I really don't get needing more than lasting the day. im fine recharging things overnight.

[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That may be fine for ordinary gadgets, but many people wear their smartwatch at night for sleep quality and HRV tracking. With my Garmin for instance, I usually wear it almost all week for continuous health tracking, and only take it off for a short while on the weekend for charging. It would really suck going from that, to having to charge my watch every day.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago

seems like having a removable backplate battery would fix that.

[-] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

I mean, I get a full week from my coros pace 2, with 5-6h of GPS cardio tracking (running) and 24h metrics (steps, stress, sleep, etc.) on a 310mAh battery. It takes a whopping 2h to recharge back to full, I would hate having to manage a tiny extra battery to save those 2h of not wearing my watch.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

each his own. 2mins each morn to swap whats in the charger and whats on the device vs waiting 2hrs once a week. ill take the swap.

[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Every device with extra swappable batteries that I've used has a charging station that you can just keep the extra battery in. Not really anything to "manage", it just effectively removes charging time from the equation.

[-] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

These watches typically come with charging cables, not a docking style station that you put them in. And keeping devices at a perpetual full charge for expended periods of time is a surefire way to kill the capacity quickly.

[-] mranderson17@infosec.pub 6 points 8 months ago

If you want to monitor sleep with it charging at night isn't possible, and remembering to charge every single day during the day is annoying in my opinion. Not everyone wants sleep monitoring though, or likes to sleep with a watch on, so I get why there's some division on the subject.

My pebble 2 hr lasts about 5 days and I'm very happy with that frequency of charging. I think it was a bit better when new but that was a long time ago.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social -2 points 8 months ago

seems like having a removable backplate battery would fix that.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online -1 points 8 months ago

If the watch battery doesn't last at least 12 months, count me out. I have too many things to worry about charging. The only reason I have a watch is because its a thing that tells time and sets alarms that I never have to worry about dying (OK, maybe a few times per decade)

[-] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 months ago

If all you want from a watch is time and alarms, you're obviously not even remotely in the demographic that any smartwatch is targeting.

[-] Sims@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

'Dimensions: 43 mm diameter, 16 mm thick'

How much is 16mm compared to other similar watches ?

[-] frogmint@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago

PineTime 11mm

Samsung Galaxy Watch6 9mm

Apple Watch Series 9 10.7mm

Google Pixel Watch 2 12.3mm

Rolex Submariner (non-smart) 13mm

[-] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

How does it compare to the banglejs 2 from espruino?

[-] clothes@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Looks way more capable than the PineTime, which is awesome. But there's no way the blood pressure sensor is reliable, right?

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Seems cool. Thiccc though.

Any ideas on price?

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
113 points (98.3% liked)

Open Source

31746 readers
172 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS