206
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 80 points 8 months ago

Wow, who could have anticipated that kernel-level anti-cheat was a bad idea? It's like people haven't been warning that giving an increasing number of programs that level of access might be a Bad Idea.

[-] cyr0catdrag0nz@sh.itjust.works 56 points 7 months ago

Kernel-level anti cheat is spyware, say it with me everybody. Complain on steam about it. Post this nonstop. This standard is NOT OK and needs to change and that's the only way it might.

[-] thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Why complain on Steam? If I remember correctly, League of Legends is downloaded through its own installer and it's completely separate to Steam

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago
[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago
[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

Around 12 years ago lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 52 points 8 months ago

I would never let some random anticheat code have kernel access. Games are demanding something crazy, and users are stupidly letting them get it.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

It's not just silently installed by Steam, or something, they have to explicitly confirm they accept it? I don't play this game, I am curious if players are unaware or actively stupid.

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

Riot's games can only be played with their own launcher, so no steam. They give a big message about "now installing vanguard, our anticheat," then inform you to reboot to finish the install, since vanguard is the only ring 0 anticheat that puts itself into the kernel start up, always running.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

honestly "installing anticheat" doesnt make justice to what it does

[-] webhead@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago
[-] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Some are unaware, but most are actively stupid. Bring this topic up in any helldiver's thread and you'll get down voted to oblivion.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I I stalled helldiver's and didn't realize I was doing that.

I'm not exactly savvy though.

[-] priapus@sh.itjust.works 43 points 8 months ago

The first time I installed Vanguard, for the Valorant beta, it decided to disable my mouse and keyboard on each boot.

[-] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago

Well, you can't cheat if you can't do anything

[-] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 9 points 8 months ago

This is why I absolutely refuse to install Valorant (and now LoL) - I could somewhat understand if an anticheat refused to boot up the game in question if something triggered it, but it going massively outside of its scope and wantonly disabling or killing other processes is just nuts to me.

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

To be fair, if they were typical RBG mouse and keyboard, and you used the brands software to change their settings, it blocked that software. Those programs were absolute dog shit in terms of security. I have no idea if it forced them to make better software, or Riot just started to allow them. Regardless it's all pointless because Vanguard has been defeated. Imagine making ring 0 anticheat that loads on boot, and it still isn't good enough, fucking LoL pun intended.

[-] priapus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Both had optional software, and I only used the keyboard. The software didn't have to be running for either to work, it was only to configure it and then it wrote the configuration to onboard memory. It was the generic mouse and keyboard input drivers provided by Windows that was blocked and it affected a pretty significant number of users.

[-] CarlosCheddar@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

This is either the final nail on the coffin for playing league on linux or it will motivate linux devs to figure out a way around it. I don’t play league but I did enjoy playing TFT with friends always on Linux.

[-] Niiru@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

TFT can at least be played via android (or emulator)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

I doubt there sustainable way around a kernel anticheat, that will not get you banned eventually. People either have to quit or dual boot.

[-] aido@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

I installed Fortnite to check out the LEGO mode without realizing EAC was a rootkit and the next Windows update bricked my PC.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

I've never had any issues with EAC, it's probably one of the least invasive kernel-level anticheats out there (with vanguard being the most invasive)

[-] AProfessional@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Have you actually audited its behavior? Both are proprietary and any kernel module is inherently dangerous.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago

Even ones like easy anticheat have given me problems where if a game didn't exit properly my whole system got bogged down and required a restart.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 months ago

Others simply dubbed it “malware” and declared they would be quitting League until the program stopped breaking PCs.

Silly that malware is okay once it stops interfering with your day to day

[-] Shadowedcross@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

One of my favourite games to have kernel level anticheat is Helldivers 2, and I think it's definitely caused a few issues for me.

[-] CarlosCheddar@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Helldivers 2 works on Linux even with the anti cheat unlike Valorant so there must be some differences there.

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

Riot's Vanguard is the only one that needs to start with boot, and always run in the background. Others can initialize and close when the game is done, IIRC. Which is why they can work with proton/wine.

[-] atocci@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago

Vanguard is always running? More reason for me to never go back to League I guess.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Supposedly it falls back to usermode anticheat on linux. That's what I heard but there wasn't a source, so could be BS.

[-] StitchIsABitch@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

It's really sad that they chose to implement it. I would've loved to play Helldivers 2 but I just refuse to allow them that level of access to my device, especially for a game that isn't even competitive.

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

That's where I'm at with the game.

Like yeah it looks fun, I'm not willingly installing malware. Especially after the apex legends debacle.

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Thankfully on linux we have tools to heavily limit it's access such as firejail. It doesn't just get unrestricted root access

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Their explanation for it makes sense though. They were running into the problem that a player could cheat and progress their games faster, etc. Since HD2 is essentially a MASSIVE, single DnD campaign that every player is a part of, those cheaters would break the campaign progress and ruin it for every single other player.

They also include shortcuts to install and uninstall only the anticheat. So you can remove it immediately once you finish playing.

[-] atocci@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

I'm curious, where are those shortcuts?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NOOBMASTER@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago
[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

There’s realistic only DotA and I can understand the reluctance, the two games are massively different, League is much more suited for casual play.

[-] hector@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

Ahaha no I swear to god Dota 2 is ridiculously fun

In LoL you play the same game over and over again.

Yesterday on dota I planted trees with my friends to hide and wait for people to come to ambush them lol

You can do all sort of funny stuff, TPing people in your base etc… everything is OP so you don’t feel like you have no agency. You feel like it’s just your skills that are lacking!

[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I mean, ive played some dota in the past, i have about 200h on it, not nearly as much as league tho. But IME, especially for solo, league is just nicer overall. The mechanics for champions seem a lot more polished these days, and it is a lot more action focused, you have to worry about macro much less. The games are also like 50% shorter in league. As a solo player I find league to be a lot more laid back, where I can just play the champ more than play the game, if that makes sense.

To each their own of course, Im not saying one game is better than the other, but it is a hard sell to transition league to dota.

[-] hector@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

You’re right, DoTa is a lot more chaotic, but there’s a lot of action on the map! Macro play is not necessarily doing nothing in this game and often time fight breakout for runes, etc…

I think it’s about preference rather than reality because we had two completely different experiences so yeah, I love League but I don’t see the point of playing it now!

[-] jacecomix@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

While I'm League hater, I would love if the Dota meta shifted to shorter games like League has. I really miss the strategic depth of normal/ranked, but realistically if I want to play more than one match per evening, I have to play turbo mode.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I loved the way CS:GO1 had an anticheat program called Overwatch. If you are experienced enough and a trusted user, you can review games that players have reported and ban the cheaters if you deem them cheating. I don't know if csgo2 has this but I haven't seen it so far.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

what about making actual authoritative servers?
that would break most cheats except *-bots

also there's usually no need to replicate the entire game state on all clients, some details like movements of players out of view can be omitted (ofc this doesn't apply to lol but whatever)

[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

But that`s haaaaaaard tho… :(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
206 points (98.1% liked)

Games

16961 readers
400 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS