CID concept is broken (discuss.ipfs.tech)

submitted 7 months ago by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TL;DR IPFS's "content addresses" don't actually address the content but a tree of the content stored in a protocol buffer, making it impossible to convert a hash to a content address.

DHT of CIDs? More like a Distributed Table of Lies!

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

It was always doomed from the start for several reasons IMO. The current design also causes it to get slower as the network gets larger...

this post was submitted on 11 May 2024

17 points (84.0% liked)

Programming

17691 readers

94 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz