93
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Amazon's self-driving robotaxi unit is being investigated by the U.S. government's highway safety agency after two of its vehicles braked suddenly and were rear-ended by motorcyclists.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in documents posted on its website Monday it will evaluate the automated driving system developed by Zoox.

Both crashes happened during daytime hours, and the motorcyclists suffered minor injuries. In both cases, the agency confirmed that the Amazon vehicles were operating in autonomous mode leading up to the crashes.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Braking suddenly like every other car on the road when something unexpected happens ahead… or did they do it while changing lanes or something?

I generally want to empathize with motorcyclists, but if all it did was stop…

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

I think the distinction is what a human sees as “something unexpected happened” vs something that the bot sees… is the bot seeing something that isn’t there, or is the human missing something that the bot noticed?

Or did they both notice something and the bot handled it in an unexpected way?

Number one rule of safe driving is to be predictable…

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 5 months ago

Rule number 2 of safe driving is assuming the driver in front of you might have to break without warning.

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I'd go so far as to swap these rules

  • Rule #1 - Awareness
  • Rule #2 - Predictability
[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Perhaps. They’re two sides of the same coin— awareness protects from unpredictability, and predictability protects from lack of awareness.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

To an extent I agree but … there’s a difference between “braking unexpectedly” and “full-service emergency brake application”. People extremely rarely do the latter, and when they do the reason is typically obvious.

I’d say some fault lies with the motorcyclist but… the bots should not be slamming on the brakes at random.

[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I agree. There’s not a lot of information in that article… but as a motorcyclist myself, you don’t trust anyone on the road. In fact, it’s safer to assume that every car wants to kill you. And these robots-taxi things apparently only go 35mph to boot.

[-] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 8 points 5 months ago

While braking suddenly is something that can happen on the roads, it's still a potentially dangerous maneuver. It's often better than the alternative (crashing into something/someone), but there's still risk involved.

If these vehicles are doing panic stops frequently and unnecessarily, that's a major problem. It's a common type of insurance fraud, for starters.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that the computer has a faster initial braking response whereas it takes time for peoples' feet to fully depress the brake pedal. A shorter time from the brake lights coming on to the brakes being at full service pressure.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

How many crashes does Elon get?

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
93 points (97.9% liked)

News

23207 readers
3693 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS